Paper · 2026 · Weed Science

Effect of planting geometry on wheat yield and wild radish ( Raphanus raphanistrum ) suppression

Muhammad Awais Arshad; Rana Nadeem Abbas; Rania Baloch; et al.

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Wild radish ( Raphanus raphanistrum L.) is a highly competitive annual broadleaf weed that significantly constrains wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) production, particularly under increasing herbicide resistance and limited chemical control options. Optimizing sowing geometry offers a practical, nonchemical approach to enhance crop competitiveness and suppress weed growth. A field study was conducted during 2022 and 2023 to evaluate the impact of different sowing geometries on R. raphanistrum suppression and wheat productivity. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design with seven treatments, including broadcast sowing; line sowing at 11, 22, and 33 cm; ridge sowing (30 cm); bed sowing (60 cm); and cross sowing (22 cm). Sowing geometry significantly influenced R. raphanistrum density and biomass at all growth stages (15 to 45 d after sowing). Narrow spacing (11 cm) consistently resulted in the lowest weed density and biomass, while the wider 33-cm spacing resulted in the highest weed pressure. Crop growth and yield responses were consistent across years, with 11-cm line sowing producing the highest number of productive tillers (393.7 m −2 ), grains per spike (42.9), biological yield (15.4 Mg ha −1 ) and grain yield (6.0 Mg ha −1 ) averaged across 2 yr. This treatment was closely followed by cross sowing (22 cm). In contrast, wider spacing (33 cm) reduced grain yield by approximately 25% to 30% due to increased weed competition and reduced crop competitiveness. Correlation and principal component analyses revealed a strong negative association between late-season weed biomass and wheat productivity, emphasizing the importance of sustained weed suppression during critical growth stages. Overall, narrow row spacing, particularly 11-cm line sowing, enhanced crop competitiveness, effectively suppressed R. raphanistrum , and maximized wheat yield, demonstrating its potential as an eco-friendly strategy for integrated weed management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing geometry significantly affected wild radish density and biomass at 15 to 45 days after sowing.

Organ / stage
15 to 45 d after sowinge0
Treatment
Sowing geometrye0
Interactor
R. raphanistrumRaphanus raphanistrume0weed
Outcome
R. raphanistrum density and biomasse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Raphanus raphanistrum
Raphanus raphanistrum · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sowing geometry significantly influenced R. raphanistrum density and biomass at all growth stages (15 to 45 d after sowing).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 11 cm row spacing, wild radish density and biomass were lowest.

Treatment
Narrow spacing (11 cm)e0
Interactor
R. raphanistrumRaphanus raphanistrume1weed
Outcome
weed density and biomasse0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
wider 33-cm spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Raphanus raphanistrum
Raphanus raphanistrum · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Narrow spacing (11 cm) consistently resulted in the lowest weed density and biomass, while the wider 33-cm spacing resulted in the highest weed pressure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1037 · show in text ↑
e1

“R. raphanistrum suppression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–515 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 33 cm row spacing, wild radish pressure was highest.

Treatment
wider 33-cm spacinge0
Interactor
R. raphanistrumRaphanus raphanistrume1weed
Outcome
weed pressuree0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Narrow spacing (11 cm)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Raphanus raphanistrum
Raphanus raphanistrum · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Narrow spacing (11 cm) consistently resulted in the lowest weed density and biomass, while the wider 33-cm spacing resulted in the highest weed pressure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1037 · show in text ↑
e1

“R. raphanistrum suppression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–515 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 11 cm line sowing, productive tillers averaged 393.7 m −2 over two years.

Treatment
11-cm line sowinge0
Outcome
number of productive tillerse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
393.7 m −2e0
Qualifier
averaged across 2 yre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“11-cm line sowing producing the highest number of productive tillers (393.7 m −2 ), grains per spike (42.9), biological yield (15.4 Mg ha −1 ) and grain yield (6.0 Mg ha −1 ) averaged across 2 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 11 cm line sowing, grains per spike averaged 42.9 over two years.

Treatment
11-cm line sowinge0
Outcome
grains per spikee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
42.9e0
Qualifier
averaged across 2 yre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“11-cm line sowing producing the highest number of productive tillers (393.7 m −2 ), grains per spike (42.9), biological yield (15.4 Mg ha −1 ) and grain yield (6.0 Mg ha −1 ) averaged across 2 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 11 cm line sowing, biological yield averaged 15.4 Mg ha −1 over two years.

Treatment
11-cm line sowinge0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15.4 Mg ha −1e0
Qualifier
averaged across 2 yre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“11-cm line sowing producing the highest number of productive tillers (393.7 m −2 ), grains per spike (42.9), biological yield (15.4 Mg ha −1 ) and grain yield (6.0 Mg ha −1 ) averaged across 2 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 11 cm line sowing, grain yield averaged 6.0 Mg ha −1 over two years.

Treatment
11-cm line sowinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.0 Mg ha −1e0
Qualifier
averaged across 2 yre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“11-cm line sowing producing the highest number of productive tillers (393.7 m −2 ), grains per spike (42.9), biological yield (15.4 Mg ha −1 ) and grain yield (6.0 Mg ha −1 ) averaged across 2 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross sowing at 22 cm closely followed 11 cm line sowing for crop growth and yield.

Treatment
cross sowing (22 cm)e0
Outcome
Crop growth and yield responsese1
Comparator
11-cm line sowinge1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment was closely followed by cross sowing (22 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1362 · show in text ↑
e1

“Crop growth and yield responses were consistent across years, with 11-cm line sowing producing the highest number of productive tillers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider 33 cm spacing reduced wheat grain yield by approximately 25% to 30%.

Treatment
wider spacing (33 cm)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
25% to 30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wider spacing (33 cm) reduced grain yield by approximately 25% to 30% due to increased weed competition and reduced crop competitiveness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1513 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-season weed biomass was strongly negatively associated with wheat productivity.

Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
wheat productivitye0
Direction
negativee0
Qualifier
late-season weed biomasse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a strong negative association between late-season weed biomass and wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1653 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify 11 cm line sowing as an integrated weed management strategy.

Interactor
R. raphanistrumRaphanus raphanistrume0weed
Outcome
11-cm line sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Raphanus raphanistrum
Raphanus raphanistrum · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“narrow row spacing, particularly 11-cm line sowing, enhanced crop competitiveness, effectively suppressed R. raphanistrum , and maximized wheat yield, demonstrating its potential as an eco-friendly strategy for integrated weed management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1752–1990 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

121 papers in the same direction as this paper · 376 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.