Paper · 2026 · Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension Economics & Sociology

Growth and Trend Analysis of Area, Production, and Productivity of Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) in India

Avadh Bihari Pal; Aditi Mathur; Susheel Kumar; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) has demonstrated remarkable commercial potential across diverse industries. It has been widely recognized for its rich phytochemical composition, including essential oils, flavonoids, phenolic compounds, and dietary fiber. This study aimed to estimate the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) and analyze linear trends in area, production, and productivity of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) cultivation in India over a 30-year period. A quantitative, descriptive research study based on secondary time-series data employing linear trend analysis and CAGR computation. The study covered fennel cultivation across India, with particular reference to leading producer states — Gujarat, Rajasthan, and Madhya Pradesh — spanning the period from 1994–95 to 2023–24. Secondary time-series data (N = 30) were sourced from Indiastat, the Department of Agriculture (Rajasthan), and the Board of Revenue (Rajasthan). Three parameters — area (thousand hectares), production (thousand MT), and productivity (MT/hectare) — were analyzed using semi-log regression (linear trend analysis Y=a+bX) and CAGR, computed as CAGR = (\(\frac{V_f}{V_i}\)) -1 The average area, production, and productivity were 59.62 thousand hectares, 90.79 thousand MT, and 1.41 MT/hectare, respectively. Area grew at a CAGR of 6.89% (R² = 0.78), production at 8.73% (R² = 0.84), and productivity at 1.69% (R² = 0.68). Production exhibited the highest variability (CV = 0.78), while productivity remained relatively stable (CV = 0.17). A notable production surge was recorded in 2023–24, reaching 376.05 thousand MT over an area of 216.02 thousand hectares. Fennel cultivation in India demonstrated a consistent and statistically significant positive growth trajectory across all three dimensions over the 30-year study period. The production growth rate surpassing both area and productivity growth rates individually indicates a combined effect of increased land allocation and improved farming efficiency. The unprecedented 2023–24 surge warrants further investigation into its contributing factors and long-term sustainability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fennel area grew at a CAGR of 6.89%.

Outcome
Areae1
Value
6.89%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“Area grew at a CAGR of 6.89% (R² = 0.78)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1340 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fennel production grew at a CAGR of 8.73%.

Outcome
productione2
Value
8.73%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–100 · show in text ↑
e2

“production at 8.73% (R² = 0.84)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1373 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fennel productivity grew at a CAGR of 1.69%.

Outcome
productivitye3
Value
1.69%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–100 · show in text ↑
e3

“productivity at 1.69% (R² = 0.68)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1412 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average fennel area over the study period was 59.62 thousand hectares.

Outcome
areae0
Value
59.62 thousand hectarese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“The average area, production, and productivity were 59.62 thousand hectares, 90.79 thousand MT, and 1.41 MT/hectare, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1298 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average fennel production over the study period was 90.79 thousand MT.

Outcome
productione0
Value
90.79 thousand MTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“The average area, production, and productivity were 59.62 thousand hectares, 90.79 thousand MT, and 1.41 MT/hectare, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1298 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average fennel productivity over the study period was 1.41 MT/hectare.

Outcome
productivitye0
Value
1.41 MT/hectaree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“The average area, production, and productivity were 59.62 thousand hectares, 90.79 thousand MT, and 1.41 MT/hectare, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1298 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fennel production showed the highest variability of the three parameters.

Outcome
highest variabilitye4
Value
CV = 0.78e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–100 · show in text ↑
e4

“Production exhibited the highest variability (CV = 0.78), while productivity remained relatively stable (CV = 0.17)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1529 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fennel productivity remained relatively stable.

Outcome
productivity remained relatively stablee4
Value
CV = 0.17e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–100 · show in text ↑
e4

“Production exhibited the highest variability (CV = 0.78), while productivity remained relatively stable (CV = 0.17)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1529 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fennel production reached a notable surge in 2023–24.

Outcome
production surgee5
Value
376.05 thousand MTe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–100 · show in text ↑
e5

“A notable production surge was recorded in 2023–24, reaching 376.05 thousand MT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1610 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The production growth rate surpassed both the area and productivity growth rates.

Outcome
production growth ratee6
Direction
surpassinge6
Comparator
area and productivity growth ratese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–100 · show in text ↑
e6

“The production growth rate surpassing both area and productivity growth rates individually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1823–1913 · show in text ↑