Paper · 2026 · Applied Soil Ecology

Which soil health indicators best track diversification benefits in tropical agroecosystems?

Anna M. Visscher; Simon Fonteyne; Mirjam Pulleman; et al.

10
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil degradation, biodiversity loss, and declining yields threaten smallholder farming in tropical regions under increasing climate pressures. Soil degradation in Mesoamerican maize-based systems is accelerated under continuous monocropping and residue burning. Crop diversification via legume integration and intercropping can regenerate soil functions, but impacts vary across contexts and sensitive indicators for monitoring of soil health effects are lacking. This study evaluated how diversified maize systems influence soil health and productivity and identified the most responsive and accessible soil health indicators. An on-farm trial in Chiapas, Mexico, compared three diversified cropping systems: (1) maize-pigeon pea single-row intercrop, (2) maize-pigeon pea double-row intercrop, and (3) maize-bean rotation, with a (4) conventional maize monoculture with residue burning (control). Four years post-implementation, we measured soil macrofauna, microbial communities (16S and ITS metabarcoding), enzyme activity, substrate-induced respiration rates (SIR), particulate organic matter (POM), permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC), potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN), aggregate stability, and bulk density. Compared to the control, diversified systems significantly improved maize yield (271%), residue cover (210%), macrofauna abundance (253%), and fungal richness (52%), while enhancing aggregate stability (18%) and microbial activity (SIR rates 34% higher). POM, POXC, and PMN were the most sensitive physicochemical indicators, where sensitivity is expressed as responsiveness relative to variability. Macrofauna metrics and enzyme activity showed high responsiveness but greater variability. For smallholder contexts, we recommend a practical, low-cost core set of indicators: soil cover, POM, POXC, PMN, and macrofauna; SIR provides additional sensitivity when resources permit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Diversified systems improved maize yield by 271% over the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
diversified systemse0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
271%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the control, diversified systems significantly improved maize yield (271%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Diversified systems improved residue cover by 210% over the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
diversified systemse0
Outcome
residue covere0
Direction
improvede0
Value
210%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the control, diversified systems significantly improved maize yield (271%), residue cover (210%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Diversified systems improved macrofauna abundance by 253% over the control.

Treatment
diversified systemse0
Outcome
macrofauna abundancee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
253%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the control, diversified systems significantly improved maize yield (271%), residue cover (210%), macrofauna abundance (253%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1362 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Diversified systems improved fungal richness by 52% over the control.

Treatment
diversified systemse0
Outcome
fungal richnesse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
52%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the control, diversified systems significantly improved maize yield (271%), residue cover (210%), macrofauna abundance (253%), and fungal richness (52%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diversified systems enhanced aggregate stability by 18% over the control.

Treatment
diversified systemse0
Outcome
aggregate stabilitye0
Direction
enhancinge0
Value
18%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the control, diversified systems significantly improved maize yield (271%), residue cover (210%), macrofauna abundance (253%), and fungal richness (52%), while enhancing aggregate stability (18%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diversified systems had SIR rates 34% higher than the control.

Treatment
diversified systemse0
Outcome
SIR ratese0
Direction
highere0
Value
34%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the control, diversified systems significantly improved maize yield (271%), residue cover (210%), macrofauna abundance (253%), and fungal richness (52%), while enhancing aggregate stability (18%) and microbial activity (SIR rates 34% higher)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1478 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POM, POXC, and PMN were the most sensitive physicochemical indicators.

Outcome
most sensitive physicochemical indicatorse0
Direction
most sensitivee0
Comparator
POM, POXC, and PMNe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“POM, POXC, and PMN were the most sensitive physicochemical indicators, where sensitivity is expressed as responsiveness relative to variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1623 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Macrofauna metrics and enzyme activity showed high responsiveness but greater variability.

Outcome
responsivenesse0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
greater variabilitye0
Comparator
POM, POXC, and PMNe1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Macrofauna metrics and enzyme activity showed high responsiveness but greater variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1714 · show in text ↑
e1

“POM, POXC, and PMN were the most sensitive physicochemical indicators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1549 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend soil cover, POM, POXC, PMN, and macrofauna as a practical low-cost core indicator set for smallholders.

Outcome
soil cover, POM, POXC, PMN, and macrofaunae0
Qualifier
smallholder contextse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“For smallholder contexts, we recommend a practical, low-cost core set of indicators: soil cover, POM, POXC, PMN, and macrofauna”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1843 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend SIR for additional sensitivity when resources permit.

Outcome
SIRe0
Qualifier
when resources permite0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“SIR provides additional sensitivity when resources permit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1845–1902 · show in text ↑