Paper · Washington State University

WEED MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN POTATO AND ONION PRODUCTION IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST

Velasco Vargas, Diana Lorena (?)

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Integrated weed management (IWM) strategies are essential for maximizing crop productivity while minimizing herbicide-induced crop injury. The study evaluated the efficacy and crop safety of herbicide programs targeting yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and onion (Allium cepa L.) production systems in the Pacific Northwest (PNW). In a field trial conducted in Pasco, WA, and Ontario, OR, preemergence (PRE)-only and PRE fb postemergence (POST) programs combining EPTC (S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate), S-metolachlor, metribuzin, and rimsulfuron consistently controlled yellow nutsedge over 90% season-long with control levels of 93% in WA and 96% in OR. Crop injury was minimal (0 to 0.5% in WA), and no injury was detected in OR; and in both locations, injury did not reduce yield. Despite comparable levels of weed control, marketable tuber yield was higher in OR (58.5 t/ha) than in WA (47.5 t/ha), suggesting that environmental factors such as soil properties and climate may have had a greater influence on tuber production than herbicide effects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide programs controlled yellow nutsedge by 93% in WA.

Taxon
yellow nutsedgee0
Treatment
preemergence (PRE)-only and PRE fb postemergence (POST) programs combining EPTC (S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate), S-metolachlor, metribuzin, and rimsulfurone0
Outcome
control levelse0
Direction
controllede0
Value
93%e0
Qualifier
season-longe0
Setting
WAe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“preemergence (PRE)-only and PRE fb postemergence (POST) programs combining EPTC (S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate), S-metolachlor, metribuzin, and rimsulfuron consistently controlled yellow nutsedge over 90% season-long with control levels of 93% in WA and 96% in OR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide programs controlled yellow nutsedge by 96% in OR.

Taxon
yellow nutsedgee0
Treatment
preemergence (PRE)-only and PRE fb postemergence (POST) programs combining EPTC (S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate), S-metolachlor, metribuzin, and rimsulfurone0
Outcome
control levelse0
Direction
controllede0
Value
96%e0
Qualifier
season-longe0
Setting
ORe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“preemergence (PRE)-only and PRE fb postemergence (POST) programs combining EPTC (S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate), S-metolachlor, metribuzin, and rimsulfuron consistently controlled yellow nutsedge over 90% season-long with control levels of 93% in WA and 96% in OR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–693 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop injury in WA was minimal at 0 to 0.5%.

Taxon
POTATO AND ONIONt0
Outcome
Crop injurye0
Direction
minimale0
Value
0 to 0.5%e0
Setting
WAe0

Verbatim

e0

“Crop injury was minimal (0 to 0.5% in WA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–735 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO AND ONION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No crop injury was detected in OR.

Taxon
POTATO AND ONIONt0
Outcome
no injury was detectede0
Setting
ORe0

Verbatim

e0

“no injury was detected in OR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO AND ONION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–46 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop injury did not reduce yield at either location.

Taxon
POTATO AND ONIONt0
Treatment
injurye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not reducee0

Verbatim

e0

“in both locations, injury did not reduce yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO AND ONION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–46 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable potato tuber yield was higher in OR at 58.5 t/ha than in WA at 47.5 t/ha.

Outcome
marketable tuber yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
58.5 t/hae0
Qualifier
47.5 t/hae0
Comparator
WAe0
Setting
ORe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“marketable tuber yield was higher in OR (58.5 t/ha) than in WA (47.5 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Environmental factors may have influenced tuber production more than herbicide effects.

Outcome
tuber productione0
Qualifier
environmental factors such as soil properties and climatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suggesting that environmental factors such as soil properties and climate may have had a greater influence on tuber production than herbicide effects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑