Paper · 2015 · American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry

Biological Control of Insect Pests of Medicinal Plants - Abelmoschus moschatus, Gloriosa superba and Withania somnifera in Forest Nursery and Plantation in Madhya Pradesh, India

Premanand Balkrishna Meshram

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out to evaluate the parasitoids (Trichogramma raoi, T. chilonis), predator (Chrysoperla cornea) and biopesticides i.e. botanicals (neem based Gronim) / mocrobials (Bacillus thuringensis and Beauveria bassiana ) against five major insect pests viz. Polytela gloriosae, Anomis flava, Earias vitella, Dysdercus cingulatus and Aphis gossypi of important target species of medicinal plants- Abelmoschus moschatus, Gloriosa superba and Withania somnifera in forest nursery, Tropical Forest Research Institute, Jabalpur and Delakhari west Chhindwara forest division, Madhya Pradesh (India). The results revealed that Bacillus thuringensis 1% followed by neem based pesticide (Gronim) 1% was found to be most effective against defoliators Polytela gloriosae on G. superba, Anomis flava and shoot/fruit borer Earias vitella on A. moschatus. Neem based pesticide (Gronim) followed by Bt 1% was found to be most effective against red bug Dysdercus cingulatus on the fruits of A. moschatus and aphid, Aphis gossypi on W. somnifera. Predator, Chrysoperla cornea @ 500 per 100 sq m followed by parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis @1500 per 100 sq m was also found to be most effective for reduction of the larval population of defoliators P. gloriosae and A. flava.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus thuringensis 1% was most effective against Polytela gloriosae on Gloriosa superba.

Taxon
G. superbaGloriosa superbae0
Treatment
Bacillus thuringensis 1%e0
Interactor
Polytela gloriosaePolytela gloriosaee0pest
Second interactor
Bacillus thuringensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
defoliators Polytela gloriosaee0
Direction
most effectivee0
Comparator
neem based pesticide (Gronim) 1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gloriosa superba
Gloriosa superba · TaxonJean-Jacques MILAN · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Polytela gloriosae
Polytela gloriosae · InteractorBalakrishnan Valappil · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus thuringensis 1% followed by neem based pesticide (Gronim) 1% was found to be most effective against defoliators Polytela gloriosae on G. superba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus thuringensis 1% was most effective against Anomis flava on Abelmoschus moschatus.

Taxon
A. moschatusAbelmoschus moschatuse0
Treatment
Bacillus thuringensis 1%e0
Interactor
Anomis flavaAnomis flavae0pest
Second interactor
Bacillus thuringensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Anomis flavae0
Direction
most effectivee0
Comparator
neem based pesticide (Gronim) 1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus moschatus
Abelmoschus moschatus · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Anomis flava
Anomis flava · InteractorLucinda Gibson & Ken Walker, Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus thuringensis 1% followed by neem based pesticide (Gronim) 1% was found to be most effective against defoliators Polytela gloriosae on G. superba, Anomis flava and shoot/fruit borer Earias vitella on A. moschatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus thuringensis 1% was most effective against Earias vitella on Abelmoschus moschatus.

Taxon
A. moschatusAbelmoschus moschatuse0
Treatment
Bacillus thuringensis 1%e0
Interactor
Earias vitellaEarias vittellae0pest
Second interactor
Bacillus thuringensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
shoot/fruit borer Earias vitellae0
Direction
most effectivee0
Comparator
neem based pesticide (Gronim) 1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus moschatus
Abelmoschus moschatus · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus thuringensis 1% followed by neem based pesticide (Gronim) 1% was found to be most effective against defoliators Polytela gloriosae on G. superba, Anomis flava and shoot/fruit borer Earias vitella on A. moschatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gronim was most effective against Dysdercus cingulatus on Abelmoschus moschatus fruit.

Taxon
A. moschatusAbelmoschus moschatuse0
Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
Neem based pesticide (Gronim)e0
Interactor
Dysdercus cingulatusDysdercus cingulatuse0pest
Outcome
red bug Dysdercus cingulatuse0
Direction
most effectivee0
Comparator
Bt 1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus moschatus
Abelmoschus moschatus · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Dysdercus cingulatus
Dysdercus cingulatus · InteractorRushenb · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neem based pesticide (Gronim) followed by Bt 1% was found to be most effective against red bug Dysdercus cingulatus on the fruits of A. moschatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gronim was most effective against Aphis gossypi on Withania somnifera.

Taxon
W. somniferaWithania somniferae0
Treatment
Neem based pesticide (Gronim)e0
Interactor
Aphis gossypie0pest
Outcome
aphid, Aphis gossypie0
Direction
most effectivee0
Comparator
Bt 1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Withania somnifera
Withania somnifera · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neem based pesticide (Gronim) followed by Bt 1% was found to be most effective against red bug Dysdercus cingulatus on the fruits of A. moschatus and aphid, Aphis gossypi on W. somnifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chrysoperla cornea at 500 per 100 sq m most effectively reduced Polytela gloriosae larvae.

Taxon
G. superbaGloriosa superbae1
Treatment
Chrysoperla cornea @ 500 per 100 sq me0
Interactor
P. gloriosaePolytela gloriosaee0pest
Second interactor
Chrysoperla corneae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
larval population of defoliators P. gloriosaee0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
Trichogramma chilonis @1500 per 100 sq me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gloriosa superba
Gloriosa superba · TaxonJean-Jacques MILAN · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Polytela gloriosae
Polytela gloriosae · InteractorBalakrishnan Valappil · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Predator, Chrysoperla cornea @ 500 per 100 sq m followed by parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis @1500 per 100 sq m was also found to be most effective for reduction of the larval population of defoliators P. gloriosae and A. flava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1285 · show in text ↑
e1

“Polytela gloriosae on G. superba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chrysoperla cornea at 500 per 100 sq m most effectively reduced Anomis flava larvae.

Taxon
A. moschatusAbelmoschus moschatuse1
Treatment
Chrysoperla cornea @ 500 per 100 sq me0
Interactor
A. flavaAnomis flavae0pest
Second interactor
Chrysoperla corneae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
larval population of defoliators P. gloriosae and A. flavae0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
Trichogramma chilonis @1500 per 100 sq me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus moschatus
Abelmoschus moschatus · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Anomis flava
Anomis flava · InteractorLucinda Gibson & Ken Walker, Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Predator, Chrysoperla cornea @ 500 per 100 sq m followed by parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis @1500 per 100 sq m was also found to be most effective for reduction of the larval population of defoliators P. gloriosae and A. flava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1285 · show in text ↑
e1

“Anomis flava and shoot/fruit borer Earias vitella on A. moschatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–868 · show in text ↑