Paper · 1996 · Korean Journal of Weed Science

Control of Spiderwort(Aneilema keisak Hassk) in No-tillage Rice

O.D. Kwon; Hae-Ryong Shin; T.D. Park; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Pre- and post-emergent control of Aneilema keisak was investigated in no-till paddy fields. In addition, a pot trial was conducted to determine use rates of the experimental post-emergent herbicide LGC40863. For pre-emergent control, butachlor(1,800g ai/ha), pretilachlor(600g ai/ha), pretilachlor plus pyrazosulfuron(300+18g ai/ha, respectively), thiobencarb plus bensulfuron(2,100+51g ai/ha, respectively), and molinate plus pyrazosulfuron(1,500+21g ai/ha, repectively) were treated at 20 days before seeding. Among the herbicides, molinate plus pyrazosulfuron was the least effective (23% control), while all other herbicides provided excellent(>95%) control of A. keisak. None of these herbicides caused rice phytotoxicity. However, rice yield in the plot treated with molinate plus pyrazosulfuron decreased about 50% due to poor A. keisak control. LGC40863 controlled A. keisak completely, by foliar application, across wide growth stages from the 5- to 15-leaf at 50g ai/ha in pot tests. In the field, treatment of LGC40863(30 to 50g ai/ha) provided >95% control of A. keisak when treated either at 15 days after transplanting or at non-productive tillering stage. Efficacy of 2,4-D and bentazon was insufficient when treated at non-productive tillering stage. These results suggest that, in no-till paddy fields, A. keisak is controlled by pre-emergent application of butachlor, pretilachlor, pretilachlor plus pyrazosulfuron, or thiobencarb plus bensulfuron, and by post-emergent application of LGC40863.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Molinate plus pyrazosulfuron gave 23% weed control, the least among tested herbicides.

Treatment
molinate plus pyrazosulfurone0
Interactor
A. keisakMurdannia keisake1weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
least effectivee0
Value
23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Murdannia keisak
Murdannia keisak · InteractorMilo Pyne. USDA SCS. 1991. Southern wetland flora: Field office guide to plant species. South National Technical Center, Fort Worth. Provided by USDA NRCS Wetla · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“molinate plus pyrazosulfuron was the least effective (23% control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“poor A. keisak control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other pre-emergent herbicides gave greater than 95% weed control.

Treatment
all other herbicidese0
Interactor
A. keisakMurdannia keisake0weed
Outcome
control of A. keisake0
Direction
excellente0
Value
>95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Murdannia keisak
Murdannia keisak · InteractorMilo Pyne. USDA SCS. 1991. Southern wetland flora: Field office guide to plant species. South National Technical Center, Fort Worth. Provided by USDA NRCS Wetla · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all other herbicides provided excellent(>95%) control of A. keisak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tested pre-emergent herbicides caused no rice phytotoxicity.

Treatment
these herbicidese0
Outcome
rice phytotoxicitye0
Direction
Nonee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“None of these herbicides caused rice phytotoxicity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield fell about 50% under molinate plus pyrazosulfuron due to poor weed control.

Treatment
molinate plus pyrazosulfurone0
Interactor
A. keisakMurdannia keisake0weed
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
about 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Murdannia keisak
Murdannia keisak · InteractorMilo Pyne. USDA SCS. 1991. Southern wetland flora: Field office guide to plant species. South National Technical Center, Fort Worth. Provided by USDA NRCS Wetla · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice yield in the plot treated with molinate plus pyrazosulfuron decreased about 50% due to poor A. keisak control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar LGC40863 at 50g ai/ha completely controlled the weed from the 5- to 15-leaf stage in pots.

Organ / stage
5- to 15-leafe0
Treatment
LGC40863e0
Interactor
A. keisakMurdannia keisake0weed
Outcome
A. keisake0
Direction
completelye0
Value
50g ai/hae0
Setting
pot testse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Murdannia keisak
Murdannia keisak · InteractorMilo Pyne. USDA SCS. 1991. Southern wetland flora: Field office guide to plant species. South National Technical Center, Fort Worth. Provided by USDA NRCS Wetla · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LGC40863 controlled A. keisak completely, by foliar application, across wide growth stages from the 5- to 15-leaf at 50g ai/ha in pot tests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field LGC40863 at 30 to 50g ai/ha gave greater than 95% control of the weed at either timing.

Treatment
LGC40863(30 to 50g ai/ha)e0
Interactor
A. keisakMurdannia keisake0weed
Outcome
control of A. keisake0
Direction
>95%e0
Value
>95%e0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Murdannia keisak
Murdannia keisak · InteractorMilo Pyne. USDA SCS. 1991. Southern wetland flora: Field office guide to plant species. South National Technical Center, Fort Worth. Provided by USDA NRCS Wetla · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the field, treatment of LGC40863(30 to 50g ai/ha) provided >95% control of A. keisak when treated either at 15 days after transplanting or at non-productive tillering stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D had insufficient weed control at non-productive tillering.

Treatment
2,4-De0
Interactor
A. keisakMurdannia keisake1weed
Outcome
Efficacye0
Direction
insufficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Murdannia keisak
Murdannia keisak · InteractorMilo Pyne. USDA SCS. 1991. Southern wetland flora: Field office guide to plant species. South National Technical Center, Fort Worth. Provided by USDA NRCS Wetla · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Efficacy of 2,4-D and bentazon was insufficient when treated at non-productive tillering stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1266 · show in text ↑
e1

“poor A. keisak control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bentazon had insufficient weed control at non-productive tillering.

Treatment
bentazone0
Interactor
A. keisakMurdannia keisake1weed
Outcome
Efficacye0
Direction
insufficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Murdannia keisak
Murdannia keisak · InteractorMilo Pyne. USDA SCS. 1991. Southern wetland flora: Field office guide to plant species. South National Technical Center, Fort Worth. Provided by USDA NRCS Wetla · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Efficacy of 2,4-D and bentazon was insufficient when treated at non-productive tillering stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1266 · show in text ↑
e1

“poor A. keisak control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend specified pre-emergent herbicides and post-emergent LGC40863 for weed control.

Interactor
A. keisakMurdannia keisake0weed
Outcome
pre-emergent application of butachlor, pretilachlor, pretilachlor plus pyrazosulfuron, or thiobencarb plus bensulfuron, and by post-emergent application of LGC40863e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Murdannia keisak
Murdannia keisak · InteractorMilo Pyne. USDA SCS. 1991. Southern wetland flora: Field office guide to plant species. South National Technical Center, Fort Worth. Provided by USDA NRCS Wetla · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. keisak is controlled by pre-emergent application of butachlor, pretilachlor, pretilachlor plus pyrazosulfuron, or thiobencarb plus bensulfuron, and by post-emergent application of LGC40863.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1512 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 · show in text ↑

herbicide · crop injury · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 10 positive, 43 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.