Paper · 1986 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

EFFECT OF STEM AND FOLIAGE SCAB DISEASE ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF VSP-1 SWEET POTATO VARIETY

Josefina G. Nayga; Ruben M. Gapasin

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sweet potato plants inoculated with scab at 2 and 4 weeks after planting (WAP) were severely infected as shown by deformation of leaves and stunted plant growth. Scab infection also caused early death of main vines. However, this was not observed in plants inoculated at 6 and 8 WAP. Significant differences in disease severity ratings, leaf area and number and weight of marketable roots were observed among the different treatments but not in fresh vine weight, and number and weight of non-marketable roots. Total root yield of plants inoculated with scab at 2 and 4 WAP was reduced relative to the control by 27.8% and 24.5%, respectively. Eight-week old inoculated plants had a yield reduction of only 4.4%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scab inoculation at 2 and 4 weeks after planting reduced total root yield by 27.8% relative to control

Taxon
Sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
inoculated with scab at 2 and 4 WAPe2
Interactor
scabe0pathogen
Outcome
Total root yielde2
Direction
reducede2
Value
27.8%e2
Qualifier
respectivelye2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet potato plants inoculated with scab at 2 and 4 weeks after planting (WAP) were severely infected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Total root yield of plants inoculated with scab at 2 and 4 WAP was reduced relative to the control by 27.8% and 24.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scab inoculation at 2 and 4 weeks after planting reduced total root yield by 24.5% relative to control

Taxon
Sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
inoculated with scab at 2 and 4 WAPe2
Interactor
scabe0pathogen
Outcome
Total root yielde2
Direction
reducede2
Value
24.5%e2
Qualifier
respectivelye2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet potato plants inoculated with scab at 2 and 4 weeks after planting (WAP) were severely infected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Total root yield of plants inoculated with scab at 2 and 4 WAP was reduced relative to the control by 27.8% and 24.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scab inoculation at 8 weeks after planting reduced yield by only 4.4%

Taxon
Sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
Eight-week old inoculated plantse3
Interactor
scabe0pathogen
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
reductione3
Value
4.4%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet potato plants inoculated with scab at 2 and 4 weeks after planting (WAP) were severely infected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“Eight-week old inoculated plants had a yield reduction of only 4.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Scab inoculation gave significant differences among treatments in disease severity ratings, leaf area and marketable root number and weight

Taxon
Sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
inoculated with scabe0
Interactor
scabe0pathogen
Outcome
disease severity ratings, leaf area and number and weight of marketable rootse4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet potato plants inoculated with scab at 2 and 4 weeks after planting (WAP) were severely infected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“Significant differences in disease severity ratings, leaf area and number and weight of marketable roots were observed among the different treatments but not in fresh vine weight, and number and weight of non-marketable roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Scab inoculation did not significantly change fresh vine weight or non-marketable root number and weight

Taxon
Sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
inoculated with scabe0
Interactor
scabe0pathogen
Outcome
fresh vine weight, and number and weight of non-marketable rootse4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet potato plants inoculated with scab at 2 and 4 weeks after planting (WAP) were severely infected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“Significant differences in disease severity ratings, leaf area and number and weight of marketable roots were observed among the different treatments but not in fresh vine weight, and number and weight of non-marketable roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scab infection caused early death of main vines of sweet potato

Taxon
Sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
Scab infectione1
Interactor
scabe1pathogen
Outcome
early death of main vinese1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet potato plants inoculated with scab at 2 and 4 weeks after planting (WAP) were severely infected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Scab infection also caused early death of main vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scab-inoculated sweet potato plants showed stunted plant growth

Taxon
Sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
inoculated with scabe0
Interactor
scabe0pathogen
Outcome
stunted plant growthe5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet potato plants inoculated with scab at 2 and 4 weeks after planting (WAP) were severely infected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e5

“Sweet potato plants inoculated with scab at 2 and 4 weeks after planting (WAP) were severely infected as shown by deformation of leaves and stunted plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

inoculation · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.