Paper · 1996 · Korean Journal of Medicinal Crop Science

Effects of Planting Date and Density on Yield and It’s Components of Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL

In-Sik Choi; Jin-Tae Cho; Seok-Yong Son; et al.

19
claims
37
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This experiment was carried out to investigate the effect of planting date and planting density on yield and yield components of Fritillariae bulbus from 1989 to 1991. The Chungbuk local variety was used, and the experimental materials were planted six times with 10 days interval from Aug. 20 to Oct. 10. 33, 22, 17 and 13 bulbs were planted by the square meter, respectively. The compound fertilizer for garlic was applied by 80kgs to the 0.1ha before planting. The experimental design was randomized block design with 3 replications. As the planting dates were earlier, the emerging dates were earlier, too. But the delay of 50 days in the planting affected to the delay of 14 days in the em­erging dates. The plant height was 22.7cms in the Aug. 20 plot. As the planting were later, the plant heights were shorter by than that. As compared with the 829kgs by the 0.1ha of Aug. 30 plot, the others recorded 1 percent increase in the Aug. 20 plot, 4 percent decrease in the Sep. 10 plot, 26 percent decrease in the Sep. 20 plot, 35 percent decrease in the Sep 30 plot, and 38 percent decrease in the Oct. 10 plot. So, the suitable planting dates were from Aug. 20 to Aug. 30.The emerging date of 33 bulb plot by the square meter was March 7, but as the planting densities were sparse, the emerging dates delayed by one to three days. The plant height of the 33 bulb plot by the square meter was 21. 8cms, but the other plots were short by . The number of shoots of the 33 bulb plot by the square meter was 6.1. but the other plots recorded 0.4 increase in the 22 bulb plot, 0.6 increase in the 17 bulb plot and 0.5 increase in the 13 bulb plot compared with that of the 33 bulb plot. Accordingly, the number of shoots in the sparse planting plot was more than that in the dense planting plot. As compared with the 854kgs by the 0.1ha of the 22 bulb plot, the other plots recored 2 percent in­crease in the 33 bulb plot, 16 percent decrease in the 17 bulb plot and 34 percent decrease in the 13 bulb plot. All things considered, for the culture of Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL in the middle region, Aug. 25 and 22 bulbs by the square meter were suitable for the planting date and density.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier planting dates led to earlier emergence.

Taxon
Fritillaria thungergii MIQUELt0
Treatment
planting datese0
Outcome
emerging datese0
Direction
earliere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“As the planting dates were earlier, the emerging dates were earlier, too”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 50-day planting delay caused a 14-day emergence delay.

Taxon
Fritillaria thungergii MIQUELt0
Treatment
delay of 50 days in the plantinge0
Outcome
em­erging datese0
Direction
delaye0
Value
14 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the delay of 50 days in the planting affected to the delay of 14 days in the em­erging dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height was 22.7cms for the Aug. 20 plot.

Taxon
Fritillaria thungergii MIQUELt0
Treatment
Aug. 20 plote0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Value
22.7cmse0

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height was 22.7cms in the Aug. 20 plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later planting produced shorter plants.

Taxon
Fritillaria thungergii MIQUELt0
Treatment
planting were latere0
Outcome
plant heightse0
Direction
shortere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“As the planting were later, the plant heights were shorter by than that”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–830 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Aug. 20 yield was 1 percent above the Aug. 30 yield.

Taxon
Fritillaria thungergii MIQUELt0
Treatment
Aug. 20 plote0
Outcome
increasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1 percente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“1 percent increase in the Aug. 20 plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Sep. 10 yield was 4 percent below Aug. 30.

Taxon
Fritillaria thungergii MIQUELt0
Treatment
Sep. 10 plote0
Outcome
decreasee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
4 percente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“4 percent decrease in the Sep. 10 plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Sep. 20 yield was 26 percent below Aug. 30.

Taxon
Fritillaria thungergii MIQUELt0
Treatment
Sep. 20 plote0
Outcome
decreasee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
26 percente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“26 percent decrease in the Sep. 20 plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Sep 30 yield was 35 percent below Aug. 30.

Taxon
Fritillaria thungergii MIQUELt0
Treatment
Sep 30 plote0
Outcome
decreasee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
35 percente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“35 percent decrease in the Sep 30 plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Oct. 10 yield was 38 percent below Aug. 30.

Taxon
Fritillaria thungergii MIQUELt0
Treatment
Oct. 10 plote0
Outcome
decreasee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
38 percente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“38 percent decrease in the Oct. 10 plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sparse planting delayed emergence by one to three days relative to 33 bulbs per square meter.

Taxon
Fritillaria thungergii MIQUELt0
Treatment
planting densities were sparsee0
Outcome
emerging datese0
Direction
delayede0
Value
one to three dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“as the planting densities were sparse, the emerging dates delayed by one to three days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 33 bulbs per square meter, plant height was 21. 8cms.

Taxon
Fritillaria thungergii MIQUELt0
Treatment
33 bulb plot by the square metere0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Value
21. 8cmse0

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height of the 33 bulb plot by the square meter was 21. 8cms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1405 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 33 bulbs per square meter, shoot count was 6.1.

Taxon
Fritillaria thungergii MIQUELt0
Treatment
33 bulb plot by the square metere0
Outcome
number of shootse0
Value
6.1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The number of shoots of the 33 bulb plot by the square meter was 6.1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 22-bulb plot had 0.4 more shoots than the 33-bulb plot.

Taxon
Fritillaria thungergii MIQUELt0
Treatment
22 bulb plote0
Outcome
increasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“0.4 increase in the 22 bulb plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 17-bulb plot had 0.6 more shoots than the 33-bulb plot.

Taxon
Fritillaria thungergii MIQUELt0
Treatment
17 bulb plote0
Outcome
increasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.6e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“0.6 increase in the 17 bulb plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1608 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 13-bulb plot had 0.5 more shoots than the 33-bulb plot.

Taxon
Fritillaria thungergii MIQUELt0
Treatment
13 bulb plote0
Outcome
increasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.5e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“0.5 increase in the 13 bulb plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1645 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 33-bulb plot yielded 2 percent more than the 22-bulb plot.

Taxon
Fritillaria thungergii MIQUELt0
Treatment
33 bulb plote0
Outcome
in­creasee0
Direction
in­creasee0
Value
2 percente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“2 percent in­crease in the 33 bulb plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1881–1920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 17-bulb plot yielded 16 percent less than the 22-bulb plot.

Taxon
Fritillaria thungergii MIQUELt0
Treatment
17 bulb plote0
Outcome
decreasee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
16 percente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“16 percent decrease in the 17 bulb plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1922–1961 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 13-bulb plot yielded 34 percent less than the 22-bulb plot.

Taxon
Fritillaria thungergii MIQUELt0
Treatment
13 bulb plote0
Outcome
decreasee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
34 percente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“34 percent decrease in the 13 bulb plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1966–2005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Aug. 25 and 22 bulbs per square meter for cultivation in the middle region.

Taxon
Fritillaria thungergii MIQUELe0
Outcome
Aug. 25 and 22 bulbs by the square metere0
Setting
middle regione0

Verbatim

e0

“for the culture of Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL in the middle region, Aug. 25 and 22 bulbs by the square meter were suitable for the planting date and density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2030–2189 · show in text ↑