Paper · 2007 · Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Agriculture

Plant protection and values of herbicide residues in soil

K Trunecka

1
claims
1
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plant protection and values of herbicide residues in soil. An emerging of technologies now allow farmers to change input application rates. The effect of residues of highly risky herbicides (trifl uraline, napropamide, imazapyr, tebutan and imazethapyr ) in soil on sugar beet was studied within the period of 1988–1998. Based on experimental results, the critical values of the above herbicides were determined together with the limits of their phytotoxic effects on this crop using biological methods. Beside better economics, environmental benefi ts are expected from this new crop management strategy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical residue values and phytotoxicity limits for the studied herbicides on sugar beet were determined by biological methods.

Treatment
residues of highly risky herbicidese0
Outcome
critical values of the above herbicidese0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of residues of highly risky herbicides (trifl uraline, napropamide, imazapyr, tebutan and imazethapyr ) in soil on sugar beet was studied within the period of 1988–1998. Based on experimental results, the critical values of the above herbicides were determined together with the limits of their phytotoxic effects on this crop using biological methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–503 · show in text ↑