Paper · 2004

Crop management and animal production in yearly rotations under inversion and no tillage.

Alan J. Franzluebbers; J. A. Stuedemann

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Integration of crops and livestock could provide benefits to both crop and livestock production systems, as well as provide economic opportunities and environmental protection. We are currently in the middle of a multi-year study to evaluate the impacts of tillage, cover crop management, and timing of grazing animals on crop and livestock production characteristics. With soil organic matter at a high level following termination of perennial pasture, we determined crop yield and animal production during the first three growing seasons of two cropping systems (sorghum/rye and wheat/pearl millet) managed under conventional tillage (CT) or no tillage (NT) and whether cover crop was grazed by cattle or not. Sorghum grain yield during the first year (52% of normal precipitation) was lower under NT (10 bu/acre) than under CT (20 bu/acre). Wheat grain yield in 2003 (39 bu/acre) and sorghum grain yield in 2003 (63 bu/acre) were unaffected by tillage regime and whether previous cover crop was grazed by cattle or not. Ungrazed cover crop biomass production was 12% greater under NT than CT for millet in 2002, 23% greater under NT than CT for rye in 2003, and 82% greater under NT than CT for millet in 2003. Cattle live-weight gain was not statistically different between tillage systems, but average daily gains were 0.5 + 0.2 lb/day greater under NT than under CT during the first three growing seasons. Results are yet incomplete to make a systemlevel assessment, but these initial results suggest that (1) NT is preserving the benefits of longterm accumulation of organic matter following perennial pasture and (2) no negative effect of cattle grazing cover crops is being carried over to subsequent grain crops. INTRODUCTION Soil organic matter is a critical component in maintaining soil quality in the southeastern USA. Pastures are known to improve soil organic C and N, which leads to retention of organically-bound nutrients and improved water relations. Cropping systems that are appropriate in this region under conditions of high soil organic matter have not been evaluated since much of the cropland has been stripped of soil organic matter from previous degradative cropping practices. Crop productivity response to tillage management following pasture termination may be significantly different than following a previously degraded land usage due to the presence of a large storage of nutrients, soil biological potential, and improved physical structure. Climatic conditions in the Southern Piedmont are characterized by high precipitation-to-potential evapotranspiration during the winter growing season, but low precipitation-to-potential evapotranspiration during the summer growing season. The impact of time of grain cropping (i.e., spring versus summer) on grain yield, forage availability, and soil properties has not been well described, especially under conditions of initially high soil organic matter following pasture. Under a potentially double-cropping environment in the southeastern USA, a cover crop following grain cropping could provide high-quality forage to supplement shortages in supply from perennial pastures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First year sorghum yield was lower under no tillage than conventional tillage, 10 versus 20 bu/acre.

Taxon
SorghumSorghume0
Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
10 bu/acree0
Qualifier
20 bu/acree0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum grain yield during the first year (52% of normal precipitation) was lower under NT (10 bu/acre) than under CT (20 bu/acre)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield in 2003 was 39 bu/acre and unaffected by tillage or prior grazing.

Treatment
tillage regimee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
unaffectede0
Value
39 bu/acree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat grain yield in 2003 (39 bu/acre) and sorghum grain yield in 2003 (63 bu/acre) were unaffected by tillage regime and whether previous cover crop was grazed by cattle or not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum grain yield in 2003 was 63 bu/acre and unaffected by tillage or prior grazing.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
tillage regimee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
unaffectede0
Value
63 bu/acree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat grain yield in 2003 (39 bu/acre) and sorghum grain yield in 2003 (63 bu/acre) were unaffected by tillage regime and whether previous cover crop was grazed by cattle or not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ungrazed millet biomass was 12% greater under no tillage in 2002.

Taxon
millete0
Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
cover crop biomass productione0
Direction
greatere0
Value
12%e0
Comparator
CTe0

Verbatim

e0

“Ungrazed cover crop biomass production was 12% greater under NT than CT for millet in 2002”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ungrazed rye biomass was 23% greater under no tillage in 2003.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
cover crop biomass productione1
Direction
greatere0
Value
23%e0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“23% greater under NT than CT for rye in 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1159 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ungrazed cover crop biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ungrazed millet biomass was 82% greater under no tillage in 2003.

Taxon
millete0
Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
cover crop biomass productione1
Direction
greatere0
Value
82%e0
Comparator
CTe0

Verbatim

e0

“82% greater under NT than CT for millet in 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ungrazed cover crop biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1061 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest no tillage preserves organic matter benefits after pasture.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Outcome
benefits of longterm accumulation of organic mattere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NT is preserving the benefits of longterm accumulation of organic matter following perennial pasture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1616 · show in text ↑
e1

“two cropping systems (sorghum/rye and wheat/pearl millet)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–600 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest grazing cover crops does not harm later grain crops.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Outcome
subsequent grain cropse0
Direction
no negative effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no negative effect of cattle grazing cover crops is being carried over to subsequent grain crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1721 · show in text ↑
e1

“two cropping systems (sorghum/rye and wheat/pearl millet)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–600 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ

123 papers: 102 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 102 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

tillage · yield · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.