Paper · 2006 · http://www.gmo-safety.eu/pdf/biosafenet/Heard.pdf

The UK Farm Scale Evaluations - the effects of GM herbicide-tolerant crops on farmland wildlife.

Matthew S. Heard

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The Farm Scale Evaluations (FSEs) were a four-year programme of research designed to compare the effects that the weed management practices associated with four genetically modified herbicide-tolerant (GMHT) and conventional crops would have on farmland wildlife in the UK. They were initiated in response to concerns that the introduction of GMHT crops might further exacerbate declines in farmland wildlife that had been observed over the 20th century. About 60 fields were sown for each of the crops, maize, beet and spring and winter oilseed rape (canola); one half-field with a conventional variety and the other with a GMHT variety. Treatment effects on the abundances of plants and invertebrates within cropped fields and in field margins over three years were recorded. In GMHT beet, spring and winter oilseed rape, weed populations (particularly dicot species) suffered large declines which in some cases persisted for at least two subsequent years. These negative effects had adverse effects on other organisms at higher trophic levels and would most likely impact upon farmland birds if the crops were introduced. Contrastingly, maize showed the opposite pattern. Subsequent work has focused on the effects of changes in herbicide regimes, modelling and measuring longer term plant dynamics, effects on higher trophic levels and statistical considerations of the overall design and results of the experiments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In GMHT beet, spring and winter oilseed rape, weed populations, particularly dicot species, declined strongly, in some cases persisting for at least two subsequent years.

Taxon
beet, spring and winter oilseed rapee0
Treatment
GMHTe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed populationse0
Direction
declinese0
Qualifier
in some cases persisted for at least two subsequent yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In GMHT beet, spring and winter oilseed rape, weed populations (particularly dicot species) suffered large declines which in some cases persisted for at least two subsequent years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In GMHT maize the weed response showed the opposite pattern to that of beet and oilseed rape.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
the opposite patterne0
Direction
oppositee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize showed the opposite pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1173 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The negative effects on weeds had adverse effects on other organisms at higher trophic levels.

Outcome
adverse effects on other organisms at higher trophic levelse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“These negative effects had adverse effects on other organisms at higher trophic levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1045 · show in text ↑