Paper · 2000 · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Quantification ofBotrytisin Grape Juice Determined by a Monoclonal Antibody-based Immunoassay

F. M. Dewey; S. E. Ebeler; D. O. Adams; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
33
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies to Botrytis//, raised in a previous study, were used to develop a plate—trapped antigen enzyme linked immunosorbent assay ( PTA-ELISA) to detect and quantify Botrytis antigens in juice from infected grapes. Using a dilution series of extracts from freezedried preparations of B. cinerea grown in liquid culture on grape juice and juice from artificially infected and healthy Cabernet Sauvignon and Semillon grapes, we have shown that BC-12.CA4, a genus-specific antibody, can be used in micro-titer PTA-ELISA tests to measure levels of infection from 0 to 5%. Forty-one samples of juice from 15 different cultivars from seven different wineries in the Central Valley region in California were tested along with juice from healthy-looking grapes of the same cultivars. No cross-reaction was found with any of the cultivars tested for juice from healthy-looking berries taken from loads with low levels of infection. Using BC-12.CA4 immunoassay levels of rot were generally higher than visual assessments of bunch rot particularly with machine-harvested grapes at the end of the season. However, in early season samples immunoassay estimates were, in some cases, lower than the visual assessments. It is strongly suspected that in the latter case fungi other than Botrytis were the main cause of bunch rot. Preliminary studies with another antibody, that recognizes both B. cinerea and Aspergillus niger, confirmed that the bunch rot in these cases was mostly due to fungi other than Botrytis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The BC-12.CA4 assay measured infection levels from 0 to 5% in grape juice.

Outcome
levels of infectione0
Value
0 to 5%e0

Not reportedTaxonInteractorInteractor role

Verbatim

e0

“BC-12.CA4, a genus-specific antibody, can be used in micro-titer PTA-ELISA tests to measure levels of infection from 0 to 5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–580 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The immunoassay showed no cross-reaction with juice from healthy-looking berries of tested cultivars.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
No cross-reactione0
Comparator
healthy-looking berriese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“No cross-reaction was found with any of the cultivars tested for juice from healthy-looking berries taken from loads with low levels of infection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–936 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BC-12.CA4 generally estimated higher rot levels than visual assessment, particularly in machine-harvested grapes late in the season.

Taxon
grapese0
Outcome
levels of rote0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
machine-harvested grapes at the end of the seasone0
Comparator
visual assessments of bunch rote0

Verbatim

e0

“Using BC-12.CA4 immunoassay levels of rot were generally higher than visual assessments of bunch rot particularly with machine-harvested grapes at the end of the season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1106 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In some early-season samples, immunoassay estimates were lower than visual assessments.

Outcome
immunoassay estimatese0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
early season samplese0
Comparator
visual assessmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“However, in early season samples immunoassay estimates were, in some cases, lower than the visual assessments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1217 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suspected fungi other than Botrytis caused the bunch rot in those early-season samples.

Interactor
fungi other than Botrytise0pathogen
Outcome
bunch rote0
Qualifier
in the latter casee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“It is strongly suspected that in the latter case fungi other than Botrytis were the main cause of bunch rot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1326 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A second antibody indicated that fungi other than Botrytis caused most bunch rot in those cases.

Interactor
fungi other than Botrytise0pathogen
Outcome
bunch rot in these casese0
Comparator
fungi other than Botrytise0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Preliminary studies with another antibody, that recognizes both B. cinerea and Aspergillus niger, confirmed that the bunch rot in these cases was mostly due to fungi other than Botrytis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1513 · show in text ↑