co2 · Quality: sugar starch · Pyrus communis (pear)
2 claims from these papers.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Physiological and Quality Responses of `Bartlett' Pears to Reduced O2 and Enhanced CO2 Levels and Storage Temperature (1990)
no changeLow O2 or high CO2 treatments did not significantly affect soluble solids content or titratable acidity of pears.
High Carbon Dioxide Treatment Modulates Sugar Metabolism and Maintains the Quality of Fresh-Cut Pear Fruit (2020)increaseCarbon dioxide promoted accumulation of total soluble solids.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
Papers reporting a positive result 1
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.
co2 on Pyrus communis (pear) against other targets
co2 · quality: sugar starch on other organisms
- Oryza sativa (rice)
- Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)
- Glycine max (soybean)
- Triticum aestivum (wheat)
- Fragaria ×ananassa (strawberry)
- Malus domestica (apple)
- Arabidopsis thaliana (thale cress)
- Solanum tuberosum (potato)
- Zea mays (maize)
- Cucumis sativus (cucumber)
- Prunus armeniaca (apricot)
- Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)