indole-3-butyric acid · Growth · Persea americana (avocado)
21 claims from these papers; 3 citations between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- AVOCADO SEEDLINGS MULTIPLE STEMS PRODUCTION (2016)
no changeIBA at 2000 mg L-1 did not affect rooting or growth of multistem avocado plants.
In vitro propagation of avocado (Persea drymifolia Ness.) (2001)decreaseRooting of avocado shoots reached 8.3% after a 4,000 mg L{sup -1} IBA pulse for 5 seconds, lower than without growth regulators (16%).
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
3 citations between these papers: 2 on the same side, 1 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 9
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
PROPAGATION OF AVOCADO CV. FUERTE BY HERBACEOUS CUTTINGS · 2006
- positive
- negative
- positive
- positive
Influence of different concentrations of Indole Butyric Acid on Cuttings of Avocado · 2018
- positive
Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Rooting of Avocado (Persea americana Mill.) Cuttings in Sikkim · 2022
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
IN VITRO PROPAGATION OF AVOCADO (PERSEA AMERICANA MILL.) · 2022
- positive
Effect of auxins on the rooting of the avocado rootstock 'Duke 7' · 2025
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2
In vitro propagation of avocado (Persea drymifolia Ness.) · 2001
- negative
AVOCADO SEEDLINGS MULTIPLE STEMS PRODUCTION · 2016
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.