nitric oxide · Growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)
15 claims from these papers.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 2
2 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Effects of Exogenous Nitric Oxide on Oxidative Damage and Activities of Protective Enzymes of Cotton Seedling (2013)
decreaseThe authors infer exogenous nitric oxide inhibits cotton seedling growth at certain concentrations.
Effects of Exogenous Nitric Oxide on Growth, Antioxidant System and Photosynthetic Characteristics in Seedling of Cotton Cultivar Under Chilling Injury Stress (2012)no changeUnder chilling stress, exogenous NO significantly increased the growth rate of leaves.
What separates themSituation: not stated · coldCompare the two papers → - Effects of Nitric Oxide and Methylene Blue on Antioxidant Capacity of the Insect-resistant Cotton Seedling Roots under NaCl Stress (2009)
increaseNitric oxide promoted cotton seedling growth in normal conditions.
Effects of Exogenous Nitric Oxide on Oxidative Damage and Activities of Protective Enzymes of Cotton Seedling (2013)decreaseThe authors infer exogenous nitric oxide inhibits cotton seedling growth at certain concentrations.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 6
Effect of different NH~+_4/NO~-_3 ratios on young cotton growth and material accumulation · 2003
- positive
- positive
- negative
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.