Growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)

1. silicon dioxideResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. sodium hydrogencarbonateResults agree7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect
3. Zea mays subsp. maysResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. selenium atomResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. hydrogen peroxideResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. AzotobacterResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. Bacillus amyloliquefaciensResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. Bacillus velezensisResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. Meloidogyne incognitaResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
10. hydrosulfideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. Azadirachta indicaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. Cucurbita maximaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. Enterobacter cloacaeResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
14. Fusarium oxysporumResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
15. GlomusResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. Hordeum vulgareResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. Lagenaria sicerariaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. Phoenix dactyliferaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. Trichoderma atrovirideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. activatorResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. bufferResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. gamma-aminobutyric acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. gelatinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. glucoseResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. glutathioneResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. hydrogen sulfideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. 5-fluorouracilResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
28. Allium cepaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. Aspergillus terreusResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
30. AzospirillumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. Azospirillum brasilenseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. Bacillus pumilusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. BurkholderiaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. CoffeaResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
35. Coriandrum sativumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. Entrophospora claroideaResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
37. Globisporangium spinosumResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
38. GlycyrrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
39. L-ascorbic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
40. L-glutamineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
41. PhomaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
42. Pontederia crassipesResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
43. Rhizoctonia solaniResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
44. Sesamum indicumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
45. Tetranychus urticaeResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
46. Trichoderma asperellumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
47. acetoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
48. benzoic acidResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
49. benzothiazoleResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
50. captanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.