Growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)

1. salinityPositive and negative results22 papers: 7 positive, 15 negative or no effect
2. growing mediumPositive and negative results19 papers: 13 positive, 6 negative or no effect
3. nanoparticlePositive and negative results19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect
4. heavy metalPositive and negative results17 papers: 1 positive, 16 negative or no effect
5. processingPositive and negative results15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect
6. classPositive and negative results14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect
7. seed treatmentPositive and negative results13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. co2Positive and negative results12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect
9. radiationPositive and negative results12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect
10. in vitroPositive and negative results10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect
11. phosphorusPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. densityPositive and negative results9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect
13. allelopathyPositive and negative results8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect
14. coldPositive and negative results8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect
15. droughtPositive and negative results7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect
16. pollutionPositive and negative results7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect
17. stagePositive and negative results7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect
18. irrigationPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
19. mulchingPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
20. organicPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
21. phPositive and negative results6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect
22. sowing timePositive and negative results6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect
23. heatPositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
24. intercroppingPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
25. uvPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
26. pathogen productPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
27. fungicidePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
28. herbicidePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
29. soil waterPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
30. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
31. storagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
32. trap barrierPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
33. potassiumResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. physical treatmentResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. rainfallResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
36. transplantingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. infectionResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
38. propertyResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
39. alkalinityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
40. cover cropResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
41. cultivation systemResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
42. limeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
43. shadeResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
44. soilResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.