selenium atom · Quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)
9 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 2
2 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Effects of selenium on herbage yield, selenium nutrition and quality of alfalfa. (2010)
no changeFoliar Se application had no remarkable effects on contents of crude protein, ash and fiber.
Effects of selenium enrichment on fermentation characteristics, selenium content and microbial community of alfalfa silage (2024)increaseSelenium enrichment raised protein, soluble carbohydrate, total selenium and organic selenium in alfalfa silage.
What separates themTest system: field · laboratoryCompare the two papers → - Selenium-induced enhancement in carbohydrate metabolism in nodulated alfalfa (Medicago sativaL.) as related to the glutathione redox state (2015)
increaseSelenium enhanced protein synthesis in nodulated low-N plants.
Effects of selenium on herbage yield, selenium nutrition and quality of alfalfa. (2010)no changeFoliar Se application had no remarkable effects on contents of crude protein, ash and fiber.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 7
Effect of selenium and cobalt fertilizers on the forage yield and quality of alfalfa. · 2009
- positive
Effect of Fulvic Acid,Zinc and Selenium Combined Application on Alfalfa Yield and Quality · 2013
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.