nickel atom · Yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)

Results differ3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ

5 claims from these papers.

Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 2

2 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect200420062008201020122014201620182020
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 1

  1. Yield and yield contributing components of Urdbean as influenced by boron molybdenum and nickel · 2020

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2

  1. Growth, nodulation and dry matter yield of blackgram cultivars under nickel stress. · 2004

  2. Influence of Boron Molybdenum and Nickel on Total Dry Matter, Partitioning and Yield of Blackgram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) · 2019

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

nickel atom on Vigna mungo (black gram) against other targets

nickel atom · yield on other organisms