botanical · Dicladispa armigera · Oryza sativa (rice)

Positive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 claims from these papers.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect19952000200520102015
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 4

  1. Effectiveness of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) products against rice hispa, Dicladispa armigera Oliv. and Hieroglyphus nigrorepletus Bol. · 1993

  2. Effect of Neem Seed Oil on Fecundity and Oviposition of Dicladispa armigera (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) · 2001

  3. Efficacy of different botanical and chemical insecticides against rice hispa (Dicladispa armigera) · 2017

  4. Bioefficacy of some newer ecofriendly insecticides against rice hispa (Dicladispa armigera Oliver) under rice ecosystem of eastern Uttar Pradesh · 2019

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1

  1. Efficacy of Neem Oil Against Rice Insect Pests Under Green House and Field Conditions · 1991

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

botanical on Oryza sativa (rice) against other targets