Molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)

1. Bacillus subtilisResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. glyphosateResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
4. prolineResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. FluridoneResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
6. L-ascorbic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. Serendipita indicaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. citric acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. lead atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. oligosaccharideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. oxalic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. phosphateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. propanilResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. spermineResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. zinc oxide nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acidResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
18. 2,4-DResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. Allium cepaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. Anabaena oscillarioidesResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. AzollaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. Azolla pinnataResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. Brevundimonas diminutaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. Brucella anthropiResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. CoronatineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. Echinochloa crus-galliResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. Funneliformis mosseaeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. L-lysineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. Laodelphax striatellusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. Sogatella furciferaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. StreptomycesResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. TrichodermaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. Zea maysResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. acetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. acibenzolar-S-methylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. allantoinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. amino acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. azideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
39. bufferResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
40. cadmium(2+)Results agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
41. calcium phosphateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
42. cartapResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
43. cationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
44. charcoalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
45. copper(2+)Results agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
46. cyanideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
47. cycloheximideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
48. cyclohexylamineResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
49. diammonium hydrogen phosphateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
50. eflornithineResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.