Disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)

1. paraquatPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. salicylhydroxamic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. sodium sulfatePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. sulfatePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. sulfuric acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. surfactantPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. trichothecenePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. trifluralinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. zearalenonePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. tebuconazoleResults agree36 papers: 36 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. Trichoderma harzianumResults agree14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. chitosanResults agree13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. acibenzolar-S-methylResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. sodium nitroprussideResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. TrichodermaResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. Vicia fabaResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. hexaconazoleResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. manganese atomResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. melatoninResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. Oryza sativaResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. carboxinResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. disinfectantResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. gamma-aminobutyric acidResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. paclobutrazolResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. sulfur atomResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. thiramResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. trifloxystrobinResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. Allium sativumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. Azadirachta indicaResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. PseudomonasResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. indole-3-acetic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. metribuzinResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. potassium chlorideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. salicylateResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. selenium atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. thiamethoxamResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. 1-aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. Clonostachys roseaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
39. SphingomonasResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
40. Trichoderma asperellumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
41. allopurinolResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
42. ammonium nitrateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
43. antioxidantResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
44. benomylResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
45. boron atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
46. captanResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
47. fluquinconazoleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
48. hydrogen sulfideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
49. metiramResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
50. oligosaccharideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.