Quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)

1. ozonePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
2. stagePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
3. tillagePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. seed treatmentResults agree14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. inoculationResults agree13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. nanoparticleResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. mycorrhizaResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. irrigationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. otherResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. in vitroResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. potassiumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. herbicideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. phosphorusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. physical treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. resistance inducerResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.