storage · Disease · Ananas comosus (pineapple)

Positive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 claims from these papers.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect2012201420162018202020222024
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 7

  1. Effects of edible lotus seed starch coating on quality of fresh-cut pineapple · 2011

  2. Preparation of Coating Agent for Fresh-Cut Fruit on Cake and Its Storage Characteristics · 2013

  3. Changes in ascorbic acid and total phenolics contents associated with browning inhibition of pineapple slices · 2019

  4. Chitosan-Based Antimicrobial Coating for Improving Postharvest Shelf Life of Pineapple · 2021

  5. Response of Post-Harvest Behavior of Pineapple (Ananas comosus var. Giant Kew) Fruits at Different Storage Conditions · 2022

  6. Effect of Composite Edible Coatings Combined with Modified Atmosphere Packaging on the Storage Quality and Microbiological Properties of Fresh-Cut Pineapple · 2023

  7. Postharvest treatments influenced the incidence of internal browning, phenol, ABA, AND GA3 contents of two pineapple clones · 2023

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2

  1. Development of internal browning during low temperature storage of pineapple cv. ‘Trad-Srithong’ fruit harvested at different times of the day · 2011

  2. Responses of GP3 and MD2 pineapple clones to the postharvest application ofwax and chitosan-based coatings · 2024

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

storage on Ananas comosus (pineapple) against other targets

storage · disease on other organisms