Growth and yield of two chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) varieties in Canterbury, New Zealand

1995 · cited 30

Open the paper

Papers linked to it

19 report a different result on a question it studies, 1 the same result; it cites 5, 21 cite it. The closest of each are drawn.

Results differ · 14 of 19Same result · 1It cites · 5Cite it · 10 of 21Effect of sowing date, nitr… (1993)Nitrogen and phosphorus fer… (2005)Effect of chickpea in assoc… (2016)Effect of irrigation and bi… (2011)Response of Chickpea to Nit… (1995)Deciphering the Potential R… (2022)Interaction between chick p… (1979)Effect Of <i>Rhizobiu… (1970)Effects of Biological and M… (2012)Suitability of chickpea ‘NB… (2015)Effect of irrigation on gro… (2008)Effect of Vescicular-Arbusc… (1998)Effect of several Rhizobium… (1986)Rhizobium sp.CCNWYC119: a s… (2018)Growth and yield response o… (2015)Dinitrogen Fixation and Nit… (1991)Kabuli chickpea as a winter… (1983)Effect of supplementary irr… (1990)Growth, yield and water use… (1990)On-Farm Assessment of Impro… (1992)Study on the Effects of Org… (2011)Variability in yield of fou… (2004)Variability in yield of fou… (2004)Development of a selection… (2010)Impact of cultivar, row spa… (2007)Response of kabuli chickpea… (2003)Response of chickpea (Cicer… (2006)Effect of different hydropr… (2011)Integrating inorganic NP ap… (2018)Effect of sowing density on… (2005)
  • Results differ
  • Same result
  • Citation
  • Darker: more recent

Click a paper to move to it; click a line to compare the two papers’ claims. Papers are core papers of the release. A link compares one claim of each paper on a question of the questions pages: the agent alone against no treatment, on the same trait. Same-result links come from questions keyed by a named compound or organism, of at most 50 papers; results-differ links also from questions keyed by a class of treatment such as irrigation or nitrogen, of at most 50 papers. Results are read from the claims by program; every link of results that differ was accepted by two model reviewers reading both claims, and what separates the two comes from the claims’ recorded dose, test system and situation. Each link shows both claims. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists.