Effect of sulphur levels on transgenic double‐low Brassica napus plants expressing a seed‐specific gene encoding a methionine‐rich 2S albumin

1996 · cited 2

Open the paper

Papers linked to it

14 report a different result on a question it studies, 6 the same result; it cites 13, 1 cite it. The closest of each are drawn.

Results differ · 14Same result · 6It cites · 10 of 13Cite it · 1THE EFFECT OF NITROGEN, SUL… (1987)Interactive effects of N an… (2007)EFFECT OF NITROGEN AND SULF… (2011)Effects of applied sulfur o… (1989)Uptake and nutrient balance… (2019)Response of Crops to Sulfur… (1974)Content and yield of oil in… (2019)Effect of Different Sulfur… (2012)Sulfur effects on sugar con… (2019)Response of new forms of wi… (2022)Influence of Sulphur Applic… (2020)Effect of Nitrogen and Sulp… (2024)Comparison of point injecti… (2015)Effects of sulfur fertilize… (2001)Sulfur Nutrition of Rapesee… (1984)Optimizing yield and qualit… (2002)[Effects of sulfur on chemi… (2007)Evaluation of the Effect of… (2016)Effect of sulphur on soil p… (2008)Effect of sulphur on soil p… (2024)Effects of Nutritional Stre… (1985)The amino‐acid sequence of… (1986)cDNA clones for Brassica na… (1983)Regulation of Legumin Level… (1983)Expression of a Soybean (Gl… (1994)Influence of Sulfur Nutriti… (1984)Cotyledonary Storage Protei… (1979)The Regulation of Pea Seed… (1990)Species and varietal differ… (1969)Lipids in Cruciferae (1968)Distribution and Mobilizati… (2005)
  • Results differ
  • Same result
  • Citation
  • Darker: more recent

Click a paper to move to it; click a line to compare the two papers’ claims. Papers are core papers of the release. A link compares one claim of each paper on a question of the questions pages: the agent alone against no treatment, on the same trait. Same-result links come from questions keyed by a named compound or organism, of at most 50 papers; results-differ links also from questions keyed by a class of treatment such as irrigation or nitrogen, of at most 50 papers. Results are read from the claims by program; every link of results that differ was accepted by two model reviewers reading both claims, and what separates the two comes from the claims’ recorded dose, test system and situation. Each link shows both claims. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists.