THE EFFECT OF NITROGEN, SULPHUR AND BORON ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF RAPESEED (Brassica napus L. and B. campestris L.)

1987 · cited 80

Open the paper

Papers linked to it

10 report a different result on a question it studies, 46 the same result; it cites 0, 35 cite it. The closest of each are drawn.

Results differ · 10Same result · 14 of 46Cite it · 7 of 35Canola response to boron in… (2003)STUDIES ON DIFFERENTIAL RES… (2010)Optimizing yield and qualit… (2002)Variation in yield, oil and… (2001)Effect of sulphur levels on… (1996)IMPROVING THE CONTENT OF OI… (2012)Evaluation of the Effect of… (2016)Effects of sulfur fertilize… (2001)Effect of sulphur on soil p… (2008)Effect of sulphur on soil p… (2024)Sulphur as a factor that af… (2016)Effect of NSB fertilizer nu… (1986)Influence of nitrogen and s… (2007)Growth, yield, and yield co… (2015)Diagnosing boron deficiency… (1994)Interactive effects of N an… (2007)Feasibility of boron fertil… (2003)Foliar application of sulfu… (2021)EFFECT OF NITROGEN AND SULF… (2011)Effect of sulphur and micro… (2015)Inoculation of rapeseed und… (2014)Effects of applied sulfur o… (1989)Uptake and nutrient balance… (2019)Yield and quality of winter… (2016)Yield, Seed Quality, and Su… (2007)Effectiveness of sulphate-S… (2002)Effects of Manure and Ferti… (2010)Camelina Yield and Quality… (2013)Perspectives on nutrient ma… (2005)Comparative nitrogen respon… (2007)Placement, rate and source… (2004)
  • Results differ
  • Same result
  • Citation
  • Darker: more recent

Click a paper to move to it; click a line to compare the two papers’ claims. Papers are core papers of the release. A link compares one claim of each paper on a question of the questions pages: the agent alone against no treatment, on the same trait. Same-result links come from questions keyed by a named compound or organism, of at most 50 papers; results-differ links also from questions keyed by a class of treatment such as irrigation or nitrogen, of at most 50 papers. Results are read from the claims by program; every link of results that differ was accepted by two model reviewers reading both claims, and what separates the two comes from the claims’ recorded dose, test system and situation. Each link shows both claims. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists.