Interactive Effect of Nitrogen and Boron on Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality

2005 · cited 27

Papers linked to it

4 report a different result on a question it studies, 15 the same result; it cites 8, 17 cite it. The closest of each are drawn.

Results differ · 4Same result · 12 of 15It cites · 8Cite it · 9 of 17Growth, yield and fiber qua… (2023)Foliar feeding of boron imp… (2020)Improving cotton yield and… (2024)Boron application influence… (2021)Boron Requirement of Irriga… (2013)The synergistic effects of… (2023)Effect of boron application… (2011)Influence of Levels and Met… (2018)Influence of Soil Applied B… (2015)Effects of Nitrogen, Sulphu… (1972)Effect of Mepiquat chloride… (2006)I Effect of Mepiquat chlori… (2001)Managing earliness and yiel… (2024)Study on Yield Effects of a… (2012)Study on Effect of Boron Fe… (2015)Effect of boron application… (2011)Response of Irrigated Acala… (2003)Boll Weight and Within‐Plan… (1994)Foliar Feeding of Cotton: E… (1998)Functions for Cotton (Gossy… (1969)Nitrogen and Mepiquat Chlor… (1994)Supplemental Boron, Boll Re… (1994)Boron and Manganese Effects… (1968)Long‐Term Nitrogen Fertiliz… (1997)Influence of Sulphur and Bo… (2012)Effect of magnesium, zinc,… (2010)Growth, Yield and Yield Com… (2011)Boron Nutrition Studies wit… (2016)Compared boron uptake and t… (2012)Response of Cotton and Whea… (2018)EFFECT OF DIFFERENT BORON A… (2020)Effect of Spraying date of… (2020)Effects of different method… (2018)
  • Results differ
  • Same result
  • Citation
  • Darker: more recent

Click a paper to move to it; click a line to compare the two papers’ claims. Papers are core papers of the release. A link compares one claim of each paper on a question of the questions pages: the agent alone against no treatment, on the same trait. Same-result links come from questions keyed by a named compound or organism, of at most 50 papers; results-differ links also from questions keyed by a class of treatment such as irrigation or nitrogen, of at most 50 papers. Results are read from the claims by program; every link of results that differ was accepted by two model reviewers reading both claims, and what separates the two comes from the claims’ recorded dose, test system and situation. Each link shows both claims. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists.