Boron Requirement of Irrigated Cotton in a Typic Haplocambid for Optimum Productivity and Seed Composition

2013 · cited 21

Open the paper

Papers linked to it

5 report a different result on a question it studies, 22 the same result; it cites 24, 15 cite it. The closest of each are drawn.

Results differ · 5Same result · 12 of 22It cites · 10 of 24Cite it · 5 of 15Growth, yield and fiber qua… (2023)Foliar feeding of boron imp… (2020)Improving cotton yield and… (2024)Comparison of a Spent Boron… (1972)Boron application influence… (2021)Interactive Effect of Nitro… (2005)Water Stress and Foliar Bor… (2015)Application of Magnetized I… (2024)EFFECTS OF GYPSUM COMBINED… (2022)The synergistic effects of… (2023)Effect of boron application… (2011)Influence of Levels and Met… (2018)Effects of Nitrogen, Sulphu… (1972)Effect of Mepiquat chloride… (2006)Short Communication: Cotton… (2009)Altering Growth Characters… (2019)I Effect of Mepiquat chlori… (2001)BORON IN PLANT STRUCTURE AN… (1998)Boron in Plant Biology (2002)Use of the Boundary Line in… (1972)Species variability in boro… (1996)Cotton Growth and Physiolog… (2003)Comparative Growth of Obsol… (1984)Foliar Feeding of Cotton: E… (1998)Cotton growth and boron dis… (2000)Comparative Growth of Obsol… (1984)Influence of Boron, Nitroge… (1969)Silicon mitigates boron def… (2019)Addition of silicon to boro… (2022)Comparative Productivity an… (2018)Determination of Residual a… (2018)Influence of Boron Nutritio… (2014)
  • Results differ
  • Same result
  • Citation
  • Darker: more recent

Click a paper to move to it; click a line to compare the two papers’ claims. Papers are core papers of the release. A link compares one claim of each paper on a question of the questions pages: the agent alone against no treatment, on the same trait. Same-result links come from questions keyed by a named compound or organism, of at most 50 papers; results-differ links also from questions keyed by a class of treatment such as irrigation or nitrogen, of at most 50 papers. Results are read from the claims by program; every link of results that differ was accepted by two model reviewers reading both claims, and what separates the two comes from the claims’ recorded dose, test system and situation. Each link shows both claims. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists.