“average leaf width”

Claim · model-written summary

Relative growth rate based on leaf width was 7.29%.

Taxon

vegetablese1

Outcome

average leaf widthe0

Value

7.29%e0

Verbatim

e0

“average plant height, average leaf length, average leaf width, average stem perimeter and average plant crown are 7.20%, 6.17%, 7.29%, 5.31% and 5.71%, respectively”

e1

“Experimented on several types of vegetables”

Claim · model-written summary

An index of total palisade cell width per mm leaf blade discriminated among peanut genotypes better than average cell width or cell number alone.

Taxon

PeanutArachis hypogaeat0

Outcome

index representing total width (μm) of palisade cells/mm leaf bladee3

Direction

more discriminativee3

Comparator

average of either cell width or cell number alonee3

Verbatim

t0

“Pod Rot Resistance in Peanut”

e3

“An index representing total width (μm) of palisade cells/mm leaf blade was more discriminative in distinguishing among genotypes than average of either cell width or cell number alone”

Claim · model-written summary

The average leaf length versus average leaf width correlation coefficient was 0.995.

Taxon

Wenzhou orange treese1

Organ / stage

spring leafe1

Outcome

average leaf-length vs.average leaf-widthe0

Value

0.995e0

Setting

orchards of the Yongzhou Vocational and Technical Collegee1

Verbatim

e0

“The adjusting coefficient for the leaf size,correlation coefficients for leaf-length vs.leaf-size and for average leaf-length vs.average leaf-width were determined as 0.6835,0.9962 and 0.995,respectively.”

e1

“We determined the spring leaf sizes of the Wenzhou orange trees grown in orchards of the Yongzhou Vocational and Technical College by using coefficient adjusting and one-dimensional regression equation methods.”

Claim · model-written summary

The average leaf length versus leaf width regression model was Y=1.1211+0.6595X.

Taxon

Wenzhou orange treese1

Organ / stage

spring leafe1

Outcome

average leaf-length vs.leaf-widthe0

Value

Y=1.1211+0.6595Xe0

Setting

orchards of the Yongzhou Vocational and Technical Collegee1

Verbatim

e0

“The one-dimensional regression equation model for average leaf-length vs.leaf-width was(Y=1.1211+0.6595X).”

e1

“We determined the spring leaf sizes of the Wenzhou orange trees grown in orchards of the Yongzhou Vocational and Technical College by using coefficient adjusting and one-dimensional regression equation methods.”

Claim · model-written summary

Mean prediction error for soybean leaf width was 3.72%.

Taxon

Glycine Max (L) Merrillt0

Outcome

average error of leaf's width predictione0

Value

3.72%e0

Verbatim

e0

“the average error of leaf's width prediction is 3.72%”

t0

“Glycine Max (L) Merrill”

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf width measurement had approximately 5.7 percent average relative error compared with manual expert measurement.

Taxon

leaves from different plant familiese1

Outcome

leaf widthe0

Value

approximately 5.7 percente0

Comparator

manual measurements by expert ecologists and botanistse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Measured leaves of comparable size have an average relative error of about 4.6 percent for leaf length and approximately 5.7 percent for leaf width when compared to manual measurements by expert ecologists and botanists”

e1

“leaves from different plant families”

Claim · model-written summary

Width to length ratio and leaf jaggedness caused the fractal value of white oak, red oak and sugar maple leaves to depart from the average.

Taxon

white oak, red oak, and sugar mapleQuercus rubraQuercus albaAcer saccharume4

Outcome

fractal valuee4

Qualifier

width to length ratio and the degree of jaggednesse4

Comparator

averagee4

Verbatim

e4

“Similar sensitivity to shape change was observed among the leaves of white oak, red oak, and sugar maple where such variables as width to length ratio and the degree of jaggedness of the leaf caused a departure of the fractal value from the average”

Claim · model-written summary

Pak Choy leaf width detection was most accurate at the 2nd week of growth, with an average accuracy of 99%.

Taxon

Pak Choye0

Outcome

accuracye3

Value

99%e3

Qualifier

2 nd weeke3

Verbatim

e0

“Pak Choy plant is a vegetable plant that can grow with soil and hydroponic media”

e3

“the best accuracy was obtained at 2 nd week with an average accuracy of 99%”

Claim · model-written summary

In apple and peach orchards the system measured tree width and extension with under 10 percent average error and high precision.

Taxon

apple and peachMalus domesticaPrunus persicae1

Organ / stage

different stages of leaf developmente1

Outcome

tree width and extensione1

Value

<10% average errore1

Qualifier

high precisione1

Setting

apple and peach orchardse1

Verbatim

e1

“Field tests in apple and peach orchards at different stages of leaf development found the system to measure tree width and extension with <10% average error and high precision”

Claim · model-written summary

The leaf area model using total midrib length times average leaflet width achieved R2 = 0.9932.

Taxon

KonjacAmorphophallus konjact0

Outcome

Total leaf blade areae0

Value

R2 = 0.9932e0

Qualifier

0-intercept linear modele0

Verbatim

t0

“Konjac”

e0

“Total leaf blade area (LA) of the irregular konjac compound leaf can be accurately (R2 = 0.9932) and consistently estimated using the 0-intercept linear model and the multiplication product of total midrib length and average width of all leaflets (TLM×AWL) is used as predictor.”