Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn transpiration was not detectably changed by the decrease in effective plant conductance and soil conductivity.

Treatment
decrease in effective plant conductance and soil conductivitye2
Outcome
Transpiratione2
Direction
not detectably changede2

Verbatim

e1

“The variation of leaf water potential at different heights in a corn crop canopy ( Zea mays ) and with time during a period of increasing drought stress were examined along with soil moisture tension and evapotranspiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–231
e2

“Transpiration was not detectably changed by the decrease in effective plant conductance and soil conductivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1845

Title

Photosynthesis Under Field Conditions. XI. Soil‐Plant‐Water Relations During Drought Stress in Corn1

J. H. Shinn; E. R. Lemon Agronomy Journal 1968. doi:10.2134/agronj1968.00021962006000040002x

Other claims from this paper (8)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At the last autumn cut, yield did not significantly correlate with annual yield.

Taxon
Ladino White Clovert0
Organ / stage
last cutting time in autumn seasone0
Outcome
correlation coefficients between yield in each cutting time and total yield a yeare1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“And there was not a significant correlation between both factors at the last cutting time in autumn season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1735
e1

“The correlation coefficients between yield in each cutting time and total yield a year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1560
t0

“Ladino White Clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–96

Title

Influence of Decrease in Stolon Number Caused by Low Temperature on Yield of Ladino White Clover Sward

Waichi AGATA; Etsuo KAMATA; Kesanari AOKI Japanese Journal of Crop Science 1969. doi:10.1626/jcs.38.143

Other claims from this paper (5)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Abaxial stomatal resistance was not significantly affected above -11 bars.

Taxon
snap beanst0
Organ / stage
abaxial surfacee1
Outcome
resistancee2
Direction
not significantly affectede0
Qualifier
greater than -11 barse0

Verbatim

e0

“not significantly affected at leaf-water potentials greater than -11 bars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–434
e2

“The average stomatal resistance for both surfaces of the leaf, which is the major diffusive resistance to water vapor, to a first approximation acts as an on-off switch and helps prevent further decline in leaf-water potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–909
t0

“Snap Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43
e1

“The stomata on the abaxial surface, which are about 7 times more numerous than on the adaxial surface, are not significantly affected at leaf-water potentials greater than -11 bars, but with further decrease in leaf-water potential, the resistance rapidly increases.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–520

Title

Stomatal Diffusion Resistance of Snap Beans. I. Influence of Leaf-Water Potential

E. T. Kanemasu; C. B. Tanner PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 1969. doi:10.1104/pp.44.11.1547

Other claims from this paper (6)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.