View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Errors associated with NIRS estimations were often one-half as large as the experimental and sampling errors .
OutcomeErrors associated with NIRS estimations e0 Comparatorexperimental and sampling errors e0 Verbatim
e0 “Errors associated with NIRS estimations were often one‐half as large as the experimental and sampling errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1741 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting errors introduced among-hill variation.
Outcomevariation among hills e0 QualifierTransplanting errors e0 Verbatim
e0 “Transplanting errors introduced variation among hills ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–929 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 Other claims from this paper (13) Method / resource observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
System parameters were identified to reduce application errors .
Outcomeapplication errors e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “A complement of system parameters was identified to reduce application errors . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–843 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Model misclassification errors ranged up to 17%.
OutcomeErrors of misclassification e0 Verbatim
e0 “Errors of misclassification for the different models ranged up to 17% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–877 t0 “Peach ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower impacting mass reduced sensing errors .
Comparatorimpacting mass e0 Verbatim
e0 “lowering the impacting mass results in amplifying the measured signal, reducing sensing errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–441 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Standard errors for comparisons between S1 lines were smaller when genotypes were treated as random than the standard errors of adjusted means with genotypes as fixed.
Outcomestandard errors for comparisons between lines e1 Comparatoradjusted means obtained when genotypes were defined as fixed e1 Verbatim
e1 “smaller standard errors for comparisons between lines were obtained when genotypes were defined as random compared to standard errors for adjusted means obtained when genotypes were defined as fixed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–650 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
APSIM yield predictions were sensitive to water balance carryover errors , sometimes causing large relative yield errors .
Outcomepredicted relative yields e1 Qualifierin some seasons large errors e1 Comparatorwater balance e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “growth of a wheat crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–946 e1 “Yield predictions with APSIM were sensitive to carry-over errors in the water balance from one season to the next, so that in some seasons large errors occurred in the predicted relative yields. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1860–2054 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In second validation, 54% of scenarios had errors within 10%.
Outcomeerrors within 10% e0 Verbatim
e0 “54% of the validation scenarios had errors within 10% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2127–2180 t0 “SOYBEAN RUST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–48 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Mass loss measurement errors were greatest at lower mass losses.
Comparatorlower mass losses e0 Verbatim
e0 “Such errors are greatest at lower mass losses. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–694 e1 “birch blocks contained 31.3% fungal biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–387 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Multi layer models avoid these errors .
Comparatormulti‐layer models e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “These errors are avoided in models that treat the canopy in terms of a number of layers – the multi‐layer models. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–878 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.