View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
A linear log-log relation between leaf area and length x width gave a correlation coefficient of 0.9984 for amaranth.
Outcomecorrelation coefficients e0 Verbatim
e0 “correlation coefficient s of 0.9986 and 0.9984 were obtained for bitter leaf and amaranth respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–487 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
TLC response for 1,8-cineole was linear from 15 to 75 μg, with correlation coefficient 0.9997.
Verbatim
e0 “The response was linear between 15 to 75 μg of 1,8-cineole, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9997 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–483 t0 “Eucalyptus Essential Oils ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–57 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
A linear log-log relation between leaf area and length x width gave a correlation coefficient of 0.9986 for bitter leaf.
Outcomecorrelation coefficients e0 Verbatim
e0 “correlation coefficient s of 0.9986 and 0.9984 were obtained for bitter leaf and amaranth respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–487 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The calibration curve was linear from 0.068 to 0.68 microgram with correlation coefficient 0.9999.
Outcomecalibration curve e0 Value0.068 microgram-0.68 microgram e0 Qualifiercorrelation coefficient of 0.9999 e0 Verbatim
e0 “The calibration curve was linear in the range of 0.068 microgram-0.68 microgram of(+)-pinoresinol-di-O-beta-D-glucopyranoside with correlation coefficient of 0.9999. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–872 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The segmented linear regression coefficient was the most independent statistic overall.
Outcomemost independent parameter e0 Comparatorsegmented linear regression coefficient e0 Verbatim
e0 “the segmented linear regression coefficient ( b1 i ) was overall the most independent parameter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1491 t0 “Common Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–59 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf area had a linear relation with fresh weight, with a correlation coefficient above 0.95.
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The leaf area was regarded as the most useful index of vegetable (lettuce) growth as a non-invasive method. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–773 e1 “It was linear to the fresh weight with high coefficient of correlation (>0.95) . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–857 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Herbage growth rate was negatively correlated with soil water deficit, correlation coefficient -0.894
Treatmentsoil water deficit e3 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e1 “herbage production in upland pastures ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–293 e3 “The linear correlation coefficient between soil water deficit and growth rate was -0.894 (P = 0.001) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–955 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Export and photosynthesis rates across all species had correlation coefficient 0.87.
Comparatorphotosynthesis rate e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “A linear regression plot of export on photosynthesis rate of all species had a correlation coefficient of 0.87. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–618 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The nonlinear correlation was significant for all three food plants.
Outcomenon-linear correlation coefficient e0 Comparatorthree food plants e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The non- linear correlation coefficient was found to be significant in the case of all the three food plants tested ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–957 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The multiple linear correlation (R) was 0.99 in the soya bean regression analysis.
Outcomemultiple linear correlation (R) e3 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “associated with seed yield in 20 genotypes of soya bean, Glycine max (L) Merr ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–92 e3 “The multiple linear correlation (R) of O. 99 with a coefficient of determination of 0.97 was recorded ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–274 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.