View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Corn had significantly less temporal yield variability than soybean or sorghum.
temporal yield variability e0 soybean or sorghum e0 Verbatim
e0 “Corn had significantly less temporal yield variability than soybean or sorghum. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1295 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Temporal variability dominated spatial variability in the study.
Temporal variability e0 much more dominant e0 spatial variability e0 Verbatim
e0 “Temporal variability was much more dominant than spatial variability in this study. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1524 t0 “Crop Sequences ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
A theoretical model suggests precision farming can reduce temporal yield variability under plausible circumstances.
precision farming e0 temporal yield variability e0 plausible circumstances e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A theoretical model is presented that suggests that there are plausible circumstances under which precision farming can reduce temporal yield variability . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–499 Other claims from this paper (1) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Temporal variability may greatly influence how spatial variability is expressed in a field.
spatial variability e0 Temporal variability e0 Verbatim
e0 “Temporal variability may greatly influence how spatial variability is expressed in a given field. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1622 t0 “Crop Sequences ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Fractal analysis was judged useful for quantifying temporal yield variation.
quantifying temporal variability in yield e5 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e5 “It appears that fractal analysis is useful in quantifying temporal variability in yield of various crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1973–2077 Other claims from this paper (9) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Yield maps may be unhelpful for future management when temporal variability is great.
may not be useful in making future management decisions e0 when temporal variability is great e0 Verbatim
e0 “Yield maps, which are used as an indication of past management in site‐specific cases, may not be useful in making future management decisions when temporal variability is great. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1801 t0 “Crop Sequences ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Average crop yield varied less over time than soil parameters varied spatially.
Temporal variability in average crop yield e4 typical spatial variability values reported by others for soil parameters e4 Verbatim
e4 “Temporal variability in average crop yield in the USA was much smaller than typical spatial variability values reported by others for soil parameters. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1822–1972 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The temporal for spatial variability assumption is sensitive to interactions at the soil plant atmosphere interface and fails under some circumstances.
under certain circumstances e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “the assumption is highly sensitive to specific interactions at the soil-plant-atmosphere interface and, consequently, does not hold under certain circumstances. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1027 t0 “impact of climate change on crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–340 Other claims from this paper (1) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean had the greatest yield variability regardless of crop sequence.
yield variability e0 regardless of crop sequence e0 Verbatim
e0 “Soybean had the greatest yield variability , regardless of crop sequence. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1440 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Continuous corn had less yield variability than corn following soybean.
Continuous corn e0 yield variability e0 corn following soybean e0 Verbatim
e0 “Continuous corn had less yield variability than corn following soybean. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1367 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
Glycine max