View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cross-validation prediction errors were similar to fitting errors .
root mean squared errors of prediction (RMSEPs) e0 fitting errors e0 Verbatim
e0 “The root mean squared errors of prediction (RMSEPs) were similar to fitting errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1084 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Cross-validation errors were similar to errors from independent data.
independent data e0 Verbatim
e0 “These errors were similar to those computed using independent data. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1342 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Thermal conductance estimation errors were similar in order to porometer measurement errors .
errors in thermal estimates of conductance e0 measurement errors using a porometer e0 Southern Portugal e1 Verbatim
e0 “The errors in thermal estimates of conductance were of the same order as the measurement errors using a porometer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–796 e1 “measured gs data from a vineyard in Southern Portugal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–681 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient delivery errors were in part due to inaccuracies in the tank concentrations rather than operational errors .
inaccuracies in the tank concentrations e2 operational errors e2 Verbatim
t0 “Computer-Controlled Delivery of Five Levels of Nutrients to Container-Grown Willow ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 e2 “the errors were in part due to inaccuracies in the tank concentrations rather than operational errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–949 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Prototype testing recorded four communication errors in 10,250 operations.
communication errors e0 four communication errors e0 10,250 operations e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “four communication errors and three valve errors occurred out of 10,250 operations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–976 e1 “nectarine orchard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–167 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Prototype testing recorded three valve errors in 10,250 operations.
three valve errors e0 10,250 operations e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “four communication errors and three valve errors occurred out of 10,250 operations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–976 e1 “nectarine orchard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–167 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The filtering routine comprised seven steps targeting different errors .
different errors e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “The routine has seven steps, each one acting over different errors . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–964 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
NIRS prediction errors were less than twice laboratory measurement errors .
standard errors of prediction (SEP) e0 less than twice e0 corresponding laboratory measurement e0 Verbatim
e0 “the standard errors of prediction (SEP) obtained from the NIRS calibration models were less than twice those of the corresponding laboratory measurement. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1140 t0 “Populus spp.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Emission factor errors were the largest source of uncertainty, followed by temperature and foliar biomass errors .
Largest uncertainty e0 errors in temperature and foliar biomass e0 Verbatim
t0 “forests ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–93 e0 “Largest uncertainty results from errors of the emission factors followed by errors in temperature and foliar biomass. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1551 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Summertime (June to September) cloud-originated errors explained 78% of the annual accumulated GPP error.
annual accumulative errors in GPP e2 Summertime errors from June to September e2 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e2 “Summertime errors from June to September explained by 78% of the annual accumulative errors in GPP ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1502 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Salix
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Populus