View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
T5 yield per plot was 5.15 kg plot −1.
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “yield per plot (5.15 kg plot −1) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1115 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
With straw mulch, total tomato yield per plot was 3.70 kg / plot .
total yield per plot e0 Verbatim
e0 “the total yield per plot was 3.70 kg / plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1366 t0 “TANAMAN TOMAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–35 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect Mulch type significantly affected tomato growth and yield. Intervention effect Straw mulch at 10 t / ha gave better tomato growth rates. Intervention effect Straw mulch at 10 t / ha gave better tomato yields. Observation With straw mulch, tomato height was 34.37 cm at 3 MST. Observation With straw mulch, tomato height was 70.27 cm at 6 MST. Observation With straw mulch, tomato stem diameter was 2.31 mm at 3 weeks. Observation With straw mulch, tomato stem diameter was 2.41 mm at 6 weeks. Observation With straw mulch, the number of tomato branches was 0.60 at 3 MST. Observation With straw mulch, the number of tomato branches was 5.80 pieces at 6 MST. Observation With straw mulch, tomato yield I was 0.93 kg / plot. Observation With straw mulch, tomato yield II was 0.99 kg / plot. Observation With straw mulch, tomato yield III was 1.79 kg / plot. Observation With straw mulch, tomato harvest yield per hectare was 6.17 t / ha. Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Maximum plot yield was 3.18 kg/ plot .
Verbatim
e0 “maximum yield kg/ plot 3.18 and minimum 2.14 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1109 t0 “broccoli ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–84 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Minimum plot yield was 2.14 kg/ plot .
Verbatim
e0 “maximum yield kg/ plot 3.18 and minimum 2.14 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1109 t0 “broccoli ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–84 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Chandini had 61.99 kg/ plot yield per plot , exceeding other cultivars.
other cultivars e0 Verbatim
t0 “GHERKIN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61 e0 “Chandini cultivar showed superiority over other cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–407 e1 “yield per plot (61.99 kg/ plot ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–634 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
On the basis of cluster means, cluster IV was the important cluster for marketable yield per plot and total yield per plot .
marketable yield plot-1 and total yield plot-1 e0 Verbatim
e0 “the important cluster was cluster IV for fruit circumstances, average fruit weight, marketable yield plot -1 and total yield plot -1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–857 e1 “brinjal landraces ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–300 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Testers differed significantly for green fodder yield per plot and grain yield per plot .
green fodder yield per plot and grain yield per plot e3 Verbatim
e0 “Four inbred lines of teosinte ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–250 e3 “While testers were varied significantly for green fodder yield per plot and grain yield per plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–833 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation Significant differences among crosses were found for all studied traits. Observation Lines differed significantly for 100-grain weight and grain yield per plot. Observation Cross × year and L × T × year interactions were significant for all studied traits, except number of tillers per plant (cross × year) and crude protein (L × T × year). Association Parent of inbred line-1 had the highest positive and significant GCA effect for TDN, 100-grain weight and grain yield per plot. Association Parent of inbred line-1 showed desirable GCA for number of tassling date (toward earliness). Association Line-3 had positive and significant GCA for green fodder yield per plot and 100-grain weight. Association The 30k8 (T1) tester was a good general combiner for 100-grain weight, crude protein and grain yield per plot. Association T2 and T3 testers were good general combiners for green fodder yield per plot and TDN. Association Top cross L1 × T3 had the highest SCA effects for TDN, number of tillers per plant and tassling date (toward earliness). Association Top cross L1 × T3 had the highest SCA effects for crude protein and grain yield per plot. Association General combining ability variance (σ²GCA) was larger than specific combining ability variance (σ²SCA) for green fodder yield per plot, 100-grain weight and grain yield per plot. Association σ²SCA was larger than σ²GCA for TDN, number of tillers per plant and plant height. Association σ²SCA was larger than σ²GCA for tassling date and crude protein percentage. Association All topcrosses were superior to their parents of teosinte for green fodder yield per plot and tassling date (toward earliness), except (L2 × T2) and (L2 × T3). Association All topcrosses were superior to their parents of teosinte for grain yield per plot and 100-grain weight, except (L2 × T2) and (L2 × T3). Association All topcrosses were superior to their parents of teosinte for crude protein, except (L2 × T3). Observation Top crosses for crude protein were L2 × T1, L3 × T1 and L4 × T1; for grain yield per plot they were L1 × T3, L1 × T2, L4 × T1, L2 × T1 and L3 × T1. Recommendation Top crosses can be used for improvement in green fodder yield and grain yield, for silage in the dough stage. Recommendation Inbred lines L1 and L3 could be recommended for advanced stage of evaluation through the breeding program. Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield gap between demonstration plot and actual farmers plot yield was 15.00 per cent.
yield gap between demonstration plot and actual farmers plot yield e2 Verbatim
t0 “yield and economics of green chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–96 e2 “15.00 per cent of yield gap between demonstration plot and actual farmers plot yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–442 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At 200% RDK, plot yield was 20.54 kg/ plot .
Not reported Treatment Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “bulb yield (20.54 kg/ plot and 48.91 t ha -1 ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–460 t0 “Onion (Allium cepa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–94 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield per hectare was significantly and positively correlated with grain yield per plot and straw yield per plot .
grain yield per plot and straw yield per plot e1 Verbatim
t0 “finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–84 e1 “The genotypic and phenotypic correlation of grain yield /ha was significant and positive with number of tillers per plant, length of finger, harvest index, grain yield per plot and straw yield per plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–362 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Cucumis
Solanum melongena
Allium cepa
Eleusine coracana