Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“estimation methods differed”

13 matchesgrouped into 2 categories

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 12 non-evaluative

Over time

1960 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Method / resource 8

Show all 8 →

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FAO Penman–Monteith estimates differed significantly from other methods.

Taxon: cropse1
Outcome: differencee0
Comparator: each of the other methodse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“significant difference between the FAO Penman–Monteith method and each of the other methods”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–816

e1
“five widely cultivated crops”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–631

Title

Comparative Evaluation of Crop Evapotranspiration Estimation Methods in a Semi-Arid Region

Peter Addo Amarkai; Sinan Süheri Sustainability 2024. doi:10.3390/su162411133

Other claims from this paper (7)

Method / resource Radiation equation ETc estimates were higher at most stations.
Method / resource Dry bean radiation ETc at Akşehir ranged 501 to 679 mm.
Method / resource Dry bean radiation ETc at Beyşehir ranged 544 to 727 mm.
Method / resource Dry bean radiation ETc at Cihanbeyli ranged 679 to 738 mm.
Method / resource Dry bean radiation ETc at Ereğli ranged 725 to 767 mm.
Method / resource ASCE Penman–Monteith yielded the lowest ETc at every station.
Recommendation Radiation equation was recommended where weather data are insufficient.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other broad-sense heritability methods differed from these and from one another.

Taxon: CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome: difference with these methodse0
Comparator: these methodse0

Verbatim

t0
“Cotton Crosses”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–139

e0
“the others methods of BSH had difference with these methods and with from each other”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1649

Title

Estimation of Heritability, Genes Number and Multivariate Analysis Using Non- segregation and Segregation Generations in Two Cotton Crosses

E. F. El-Hashash; W. M. B. Yehia Asian Journal of Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular Biology 2021. doi:10.9734/ajbgmb/2021/v9i330221

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation Heritability estimates for yield traits were described as high and significant in both crosses.
Method / resource Mahmood & Kramer and Burton methods gave the highest broad-sense heritability estimates.
Method / resource Mod.Weber & Moorthy gave the lowest broad-sense heritability estimates.
Method / resource N3 yielded much higher gene-number estimates than other equations.
Method / resource Ranking and clustering found differences among most heritability and gene-number methods.
Method / resource Mather & Jinks and Lawrence & Jinks methods yielded identical values.
Method / resource Mahmud & Kramer and Briggs & Krowles methods gave equal or close estimates.
Method / resource Weber & Moorthy and Kotecha & Zimmerman methods gave equal or close estimates.
Method / resource PC1 and PC2 distinguished generations into groups.
Observation PC1 and PC2 accounted for 86.29% cumulative variability in G.85 x TNB.
Observation PC1 and PC2 accounted for 92.36% cumulative variability in G.86 x Suvin.
Observation PC1 had an eigenvalue above one across studied traits and populations.
Association High-variability PCs positively correlated with yield and its components.
Recommendation BC1 was the most appropriate selection generation for G.85 x TNB.
Recommendation F2 and BC1 were the most appropriate selection generations for G.86 x Suvin.
Recommendation Two to five backcross cycles at Suvin parent may improve cotton yield in Egypt.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best spectral preprocessing method differed by wood property.

Taxon: Tectona grandisTectona grandist0
Outcome: near infrared spectra pre-processing methodse0
Comparator: propertye0

Verbatim

e0
“The best near infrared spectra pre-processing methods differed by property.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–575

t0
“Tectona grandis wood”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–87

Title

Estimation of density, moisture content and strength properties of Tectona grandis wood using Near Infrared Spectroscopy

Shri Ram Shukla; Suman Kumar Sharma Maderas Ciencia y tecnología 2021. doi:10.4067/s0718-221x2021000100418

Other claims from this paper (2)

Observation 5

Show all 5 →

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatability estimates differed across crops, traits and estimation methods.

Taxon: Bertholletia excelsaBertholletia excelsae0
Outcome: repeatability coefficientse1
Qualifier: varied among crops, traits and estimation methodse1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Bertholletia excelsa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–106

e1
“Estimates of repeatability coefficients varied among crops, traits and estimation methods.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–851

Title

Repetibility of the yield traits of Brazil nut cultivated in Roraima

Cássia Ângela Pedrozo; Ayulle Thalía Watson Alcoforado; Marcos Miguel Mayer; et al. Scientia Forestalis 2021. doi:10.18671/scifor.v49n129.25

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GWF estimated by FBM and T1M differed by up to 3961 %.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Outcome: GWFs estimated by FBM and T1Me4
Value: up to 3961 %e4

Verbatim

e4
“While a difference of up to 3961 % was observed between GWFs estimated by FBM and T1M”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1644

e0
“applied three different methods for estimating the GWF during the rice production process”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–344

Title

A comparative assessment of grey water footprint estimation methods in paddy fields

Mahsa Naderi; Abdullah Darzi-Naftchali; Fatemeh Karandish; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2024. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109269

Other claims from this paper (12)

Method / resource HYDRUS-2D RMSE was 0.25–0.99 mg L −1 and within the acceptable range.
Method / resource HYDRUS-2D nRMSE was 5.3–19.1 % and within the acceptable range.
Method / resource HYDRUS-2D nMBE was -2.14–10.47 % and within the acceptable range.
Method / resource HYDRUS-2D model efficiency EF was 0.6–1.0 and within the acceptable range.
Observation The GWF determined using the field-based method ranged from 17 to 2995 m3 t−1.
Observation The GWF determined using the tier-1 method ranged from 701 to 1368 m3 t−1.
Observation The GWF determined using the HYDRUS-2D model ranged from 19 to 2770 m3 t−1.
Method / resource HYDRUS-2D provided values closer to the field-based method, with relative errors of 5 % to 12 %.
Intervention effect Alternate wetting and drying had a substantially greater GWF than mid-season drainage.
Intervention effect Increasing the drainage intensity raised the GWF under both AWD and MSD.
Method / resource Using the GWF obtained by T1M is associated with substantial uncertainties in practice.
Method / resource HYDRUS-2D predicted GWF more precisely than the tier-1 method.

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface and subsurface drip irrigation differed significantly

Taxon: pistachioPistacia verae1
Outcome: significant difference between surface and subsurface drip irrigation methodse0

Verbatim

e0
“Other results of this research include the significant difference between surface and subsurface drip irrigation methods”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 6841–6961

e1
“The present research has been carried out in pistachio orchards in Zarandieh city of Markazi province”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2241–2342

Title

Estimation of actual evapotranspiration in pistachio orchards using SEBAL algorithm in three irrigation system

Soheil Radiom 2021

Other claims from this paper (10)

Method / resource SEBAL estimated actual evapotranspiration in pistachio orchards with an RMS error of 0.57 relative to the water balance method
Method / resource Correlation between SEBAL and water balance evapotranspiration values was 0.82
Method / resource Correlation between SEBAL evapotranspiration and reference evapotranspiration was 0.76
Intervention effect Subsurface irrigation had the lowest average evapotranspiration in pistachio orchards
Intervention effect Surface drip irrigation had more average evapotranspiration than flood irrigation on all dates
Intervention effect Flood irrigation had higher ranges and standard deviation of evapotranspiration than other systems
Intervention effect Drip irrigation orchards had denser vegetation than flood irrigation orchards
Recommendation Subsurface irrigation methods can effectively reduce irrigation water loss from evaporation
Observation Evapotranspiration heterogeneity occurred in all parts of orchards with the same irrigation system
Observation The middle part of surface drip irrigated orchards always showed a higher amount of evapotranspiration

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“estimation methods differed”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

Method / resource 8

Observation 5