View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: maize ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In maize under elevated CO2, leaf relative water content starts to decrease at a lower FTSW threshold than in wheat (0.21 vs 0.43).
Outcomeleaf relative water content e6 Directionstarts to decrease e6 Verbatim
e5 “After onset of progressive soil drying, maize plants in e[CO 2 ] showed lower FTSW thresholds than wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–899 e6 “at which e.g. g s (0.31 vs 0.40) and leaf relative water content (0.21 vs 0.43) starts to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–999 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 increased the net photosynthetic rate only in wheat. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 increased dry matter accumulation in wheat and maize. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 decreased stomatal conductance and water consumption. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 enhanced WUE by 27.82% in maize. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 enhanced WUE by 49.86% in wheat. Association After onset of progressive soil drying, maize under elevated CO2 showed lower FTSW thresholds than wheat. Association In maize under elevated CO2, stomatal conductance starts to decrease at a lower FTSW threshold than in wheat (0.31 vs 0.40). Association The authors interpret elevated CO2 as conferring greater drought resistance in maize. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, enhanced WUE was found only in wheat. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, DMA increased in wheat. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, water consumption was unaffected in wheat. Recommendation The authors recommend developing specific water management strategies to optimize crop WUE for different species under future drier, CO2-enriched conditions. Association observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content decrease d with salt, but the decline was not significant.
Treatmentincreasing salt e0 OutcomeLeaf relative water content e0 Verbatim
e0 “Leaf relative water content decrease d with in creasing salt, but this decrease was not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–957 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced relative water content was accompanied by in creased stomatal resistance and leaf temperature.
Outcomestomatal resistance and leaf temperature e0 Qualifierdecrease in RWC e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in RWC was accompanied by an in crease in stomatal resistance and leaf temperature ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–1967 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At seawater content up to 25%, raised SNP concentration in creased proline, MDA and relative water content s in maize roots.
TreatmentSNP concentration e2 Outcomethe contents of proline,methyldialdehyde and relative water e2 Qualifierthe seawater content is not above twenty-five percent e2 Verbatim
e0 “stress-tolerant maize variety Nongda108 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–219 e2 “When the seawater content is not above twenty-five percent,and as well as,the SNP concentration rise,the content s of proline,methyldialdehyde and relative water and relative electroconductance in crease respectively,but the content s of soluble sugar decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–870 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At seawater content up to 25%, raised SNP concentration in creased relative electroconductance in maize roots.
TreatmentSNP concentration e2 Outcomerelative electroconductance e2 Qualifierthe seawater content is not above twenty-five percent e2 Verbatim
e0 “stress-tolerant maize variety Nongda108 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–219 e2 “When the seawater content is not above twenty-five percent,and as well as,the SNP concentration rise,the content s of proline,methyldialdehyde and relative water and relative electroconductance in crease respectively,but the content s of soluble sugar decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–870 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At seawater content up to 25%, raised SNP concentration decrease d soluble sugar content s in maize roots.
TreatmentSNP concentration e2 Outcomethe contents of soluble sugar e2 Qualifierthe seawater content is not above twenty-five percent e2 Verbatim
e0 “stress-tolerant maize variety Nongda108 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–219 e2 “When the seawater content is not above twenty-five percent,and as well as,the SNP concentration rise,the content s of proline,methyldialdehyde and relative water and relative electroconductance in crease respectively,but the content s of soluble sugar decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–870 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In maize under elevated CO2, stomatal conductance starts to decrease at a lower FTSW threshold than in wheat (0.31 vs 0.40).
Directionstarts to decrease e6 Verbatim
e5 “After onset of progressive soil drying, maize plants in e[CO 2 ] showed lower FTSW thresholds than wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–899 e6 “at which e.g. g s (0.31 vs 0.40) and leaf relative water content (0.21 vs 0.43) starts to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–999 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 increased the net photosynthetic rate only in wheat. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 increased dry matter accumulation in wheat and maize. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 decreased stomatal conductance and water consumption. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 enhanced WUE by 27.82% in maize. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 enhanced WUE by 49.86% in wheat. Association After onset of progressive soil drying, maize under elevated CO2 showed lower FTSW thresholds than wheat. Association In maize under elevated CO2, leaf relative water content starts to decrease at a lower FTSW threshold than in wheat (0.21 vs 0.43). Association The authors interpret elevated CO2 as conferring greater drought resistance in maize. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, enhanced WUE was found only in wheat. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, DMA increased in wheat. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, water consumption was unaffected in wheat. Recommendation The authors recommend developing specific water management strategies to optimize crop WUE for different species under future drier, CO2-enriched conditions. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.