View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Manure reduced rye yield variability under Ca and CaPK.
Treatmentadditional manure e0 Outcometemporal yield variability of rye e0 QualifierCa and CaPK (without mineral N) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “additional manure in ‘sub-optimal’ mineral fertilizer treatments, such as Ca and CaPK (without mineral N), reduced the temporal yield variability of rye ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1221 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation reduced spatial and temporal yield variability .
Outcomevariability both spatially and temporally e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Irrigation improved yield by at least 1000 kg ha-1 in half of the years simulated, and alsoshowed to have less variability both spatially and temporal ly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1219 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Interactions between plant spacing variability and emergence variability were not significant for corn yield .
Treatmentinteractions between the two factors e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “interactions between the two factors were not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1719 e1 “did not affect yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1656 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Emergence variability significantly affected corn height, leaf area index, dry matter accumulation, and grain yield .
Treatmentplant emergence variability e0 Outcomeplant height, leaf area index (LAI), dry matter accumulation e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Only plant emergence variability significantly affected plant height, leaf area index (LAI), dry matter accumulation, and grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1074 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil fertility amendments did not alleviate yearly maize yield variability .
TreatmentSoil fertility amendments e0 Outcomeyear‐to‐year variability observed in the corn ( Zea mays L.) yield e0 Directiondid not alleviate e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Soil fertility amendments did not alleviate year‐to‐year variability observed in the corn ( Zea mays L.) yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1482 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Corn is more responsive to plant emergence variability than to plant spacing variability .
Treatmentplant emergence variability e0 Directionmore responsive e0 Comparatorplant spacing variability e0 Verbatim
e0 “corn is more responsive to plant emergence variability than plant spacing variability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1550 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Only plant emergence variability significantly affected corn plant height, leaf area index and dry matter accumulation.
Treatmentplant emergence variability e0 Outcomeplant height, leaf area index (LAI), dry matter accumulation e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Only plant emergence variability significantly affected plant height, leaf area index (LAI), dry matter accumulation, and grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1074 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Organic input increased rye yield variability under CaNPK and NPK.
Treatmentadditional organic input e0 Outcomevariable rye yields e0 Comparatorthose with no additional manure e0 Verbatim
e0 “additional organic input led to more variable rye yield s in already ‘optimal’ treatments including mineral N (CaNPK and NPK), compared to those with no additional manure ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1405 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Within-row spacing variation did not affect corn yield .
Treatmentvariation in within-row spacing e0 Directiondid not affect e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “variation in within-row spacing did not affect yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1655 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Variation in within-row spacing did not affect corn yield .
Treatmentvariation in within‐row spacing e0 Directiondid not affect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “variation in within‐row spacing did not affect yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1604–1656 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.