View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result negative significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Temperature data errors influenced both crop models significantly more than precipitation errors .
influence on both models e0 errors in precipitation e0 Verbatim
e0 “errors in temperature data have a significantly stronger influence on both models than errors in precipitation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–631 t0 “a process-based crop model and a statistical crop model ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–506 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Partial occlusions commonly caused errors in blueberry detection models.
partial occlusions e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “partial occlusions commonly cause errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–802 t0 “Blueberry Detection ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–61 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
SSEB errors were 22%.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “SSEB exhibited greater errors at 22% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–959 e1 “banana crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–432 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Methods for leaf water potential may have similar temperature related errors .
Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “Similar errors may occur in methods for measuring leaf water potential ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–316 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
APSIM yield predictions were sensitive to water balance carryover errors , sometimes causing large relative yield errors .
predicted relative yields e1 in some seasons large errors e1 water balance e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “growth of a wheat crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–946 e1 “Yield predictions with APSIM were sensitive to carry-over errors in the water balance from one season to the next, so that in some seasons large errors occurred in the predicted relative yields. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1860–2054 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
SSEB errors reached 22% in the vegetated areas.
Verbatim
e0 “SSEB exhibited greater errors at 22% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–960 t0 “banana crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–432 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The other two laboratories made seven wheat hardness classification errors .
Verbatim
e0 “Six laboratories achieved a near perfect classification with only three errors in all, but the other two had seven errors between them ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1720–1854 e1 “Wheat kernel hardness ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1578 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Adsorption errors were larger in turgid tissue.
errors due to adsorption e0 Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “the errors due to adsorption were larger with turgid tissue ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–781 e1 “soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) leaf water potentials ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–408 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Classification errors occurred mainly among visually similar species.
Classification errors e0 high visual similarities e0 species with high visual similarities e0 Verbatim
e0 “Classification errors occurred mainly in species with high visual similarities. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1255 t0 “Plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Prediction errors were large above 9000 kg/ha.
prediction errors e0 Verbatim
e0 “with large prediction errors above 9000 kg/ha. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1459 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivum
Glycine max