View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Prediction errors matched the magnitude of calculated probable errors .
Prediction errors e0 same magnitude e0 calculated probable errors e0 Verbatim
e0 “Prediction errors were of the same magnitude as the calculated probable errors . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1041 e1 “living tobacco plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–600 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cross-validation prediction errors were similar to fitting errors .
root mean squared errors of prediction (RMSEPs) e0 fitting errors e0 Verbatim
e0 “The root mean squared errors of prediction (RMSEPs) were similar to fitting errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1084 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Cross-validation errors were similar to errors from independent data.
independent data e0 Verbatim
e0 “These errors were similar to those computed using independent data. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1342 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Country and crop forecasting errors were comparable to group-level errors .
the ones obtained for the group e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the errors obtained are comparable to the ones obtained for the group. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1073 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Errors associated with NIRS estimations were often one-half as large as the experimental and sampling errors .
Errors associated with NIRS estimations e0 experimental and sampling errors e0 Verbatim
e0 “Errors associated with NIRS estimations were often one‐half as large as the experimental and sampling errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1741 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Thermal conductance estimation errors were similar in order to porometer measurement errors .
errors in thermal estimates of conductance e0 measurement errors using a porometer e0 Southern Portugal e1 Verbatim
e0 “The errors in thermal estimates of conductance were of the same order as the measurement errors using a porometer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–796 e1 “measured gs data from a vineyard in Southern Portugal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–681 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Detection errors included more commission errors in upper stems.
upper stem regions e0 commission errors e0 Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “Error patterns revealed more commission errors in upper stem regions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1283 t0 “Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–501 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient delivery errors were in part due to inaccuracies in the tank concentrations rather than operational errors .
inaccuracies in the tank concentrations e2 operational errors e2 Verbatim
t0 “Computer-Controlled Delivery of Five Levels of Nutrients to Container-Grown Willow ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 e2 “the errors were in part due to inaccuracies in the tank concentrations rather than operational errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–949 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result negative significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Temperature data errors influenced both crop models significantly more than precipitation errors .
influence on both models e0 errors in precipitation e0 Verbatim
e0 “errors in temperature data have a significantly stronger influence on both models than errors in precipitation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–631 t0 “a process-based crop model and a statistical crop model ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–506 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Prototype testing recorded four communication errors in 10,250 operations.
communication errors e0 four communication errors e0 10,250 operations e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “four communication errors and three valve errors occurred out of 10,250 operations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–976 e1 “nectarine orchard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–167 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Nicotiana tabacume1
Pinus sylvestris
Salix
Prunus persica var. nucipersica