Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease in density”

6 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 3 non-evaluative

Over time

2020

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W7148423190 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With higher crop density, general bushiness decreased by 0.16

Taxon: spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaree0
Treatment: an increase in crop densitye1
Outcome: bushinesse1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 0.16e1
Qualifier: generale1
Comparator: crop density 5.0 million pcs./ha (control)e2

Verbatim

e0
“The object of study was 31 samples of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–360

e1
“with an increase in crop density, there was a significant decrease in general (by 0.16) and productive (0.11) bushiness, ear length (0.2 cm), number of spikelets (0.8 pcs.) and grains (0.7 pcs.), grain weight per plant (0.06 g)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1548

e2
“The scheme of the experiments: crop density 5.0 million pcs./ha (control) and 7.0 million pcs./ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–459

Title

Features of Morphological Reactions of Collection Samples of Spring Barley to an Increase in Crop Density

L. V. Panikhina; I. N. Shchennikova Russian Agricultural Sciences 2025. doi:10.3103/s1068367425701204

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect With higher crop density, productive bushiness decreased by 0.11
Intervention effect With higher crop density, ear length decreased by 0.2 cm
Intervention effect With higher crop density, the number of spikelets decreased by 0.8 pcs.
Intervention effect With higher crop density, the number of grains per ear decreased by 0.7 pcs.
Intervention effect With higher crop density, grain weight per plant decreased by 0.06 g
Intervention effect Selected barley samples significantly increased yield by 165…243 g/m2 with an increase in crop density
Intervention effect Selected barley samples significantly increased grain weight from the plant by 0.28…0.68 g with an increase in crop density
Intervention effect Selected barley samples significantly increased thousand-kernel weight by 2.4…4.0 g with an increase in crop density
Association Meteorological conditions explained 43.6–69.3% of the variation in yield, ear length, grain number per ear and productivity
Association Meteorological conditions explained 43.6–69.3% of the variation in productivity of the ear and the plant
Association Crop density explained 16.8–27.9% of the number of plants preserved for harvesting and productive stand
Observation On average 411 pcs./m2 (93%) remained in the control for harvesting
Observation On average 585 pcs./m2 (92%) remained in the experiment with the higher crop density

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With higher crop density, productive bushiness decreased by 0.11

Taxon: spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaree0
Treatment: an increase in crop densitye1
Outcome: bushinesse1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 0.11e1
Qualifier: productivee1
Comparator: crop density 5.0 million pcs./ha (control)e2

Verbatim

e0
“The object of study was 31 samples of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–360

e1
“with an increase in crop density, there was a significant decrease in general (by 0.16) and productive (0.11) bushiness, ear length (0.2 cm), number of spikelets (0.8 pcs.) and grains (0.7 pcs.), grain weight per plant (0.06 g)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1548

e2
“The scheme of the experiments: crop density 5.0 million pcs./ha (control) and 7.0 million pcs./ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–459

Title

Features of Morphological Reactions of Collection Samples of Spring Barley to an Increase in Crop Density

L. V. Panikhina; I. N. Shchennikova Russian Agricultural Sciences 2025. doi:10.3103/s1068367425701204

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect With higher crop density, general bushiness decreased by 0.16
Intervention effect With higher crop density, ear length decreased by 0.2 cm
Intervention effect With higher crop density, the number of spikelets decreased by 0.8 pcs.
Intervention effect With higher crop density, the number of grains per ear decreased by 0.7 pcs.
Intervention effect With higher crop density, grain weight per plant decreased by 0.06 g
Intervention effect Selected barley samples significantly increased yield by 165…243 g/m2 with an increase in crop density
Intervention effect Selected barley samples significantly increased grain weight from the plant by 0.28…0.68 g with an increase in crop density
Intervention effect Selected barley samples significantly increased thousand-kernel weight by 2.4…4.0 g with an increase in crop density
Association Meteorological conditions explained 43.6–69.3% of the variation in yield, ear length, grain number per ear and productivity
Association Meteorological conditions explained 43.6–69.3% of the variation in productivity of the ear and the plant
Association Crop density explained 16.8–27.9% of the number of plants preserved for harvesting and productive stand
Observation On average 411 pcs./m2 (93%) remained in the control for harvesting
Observation On average 585 pcs./m2 (92%) remained in the experiment with the higher crop density

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With higher crop density, ear length decreased by 0.2 cm

Taxon: spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaree0
Treatment: an increase in crop densitye1
Outcome: ear lengthe1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 0.2 cme1
Comparator: crop density 5.0 million pcs./ha (control)e2

Verbatim

e0
“The object of study was 31 samples of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–360

e1
“with an increase in crop density, there was a significant decrease in general (by 0.16) and productive (0.11) bushiness, ear length (0.2 cm), number of spikelets (0.8 pcs.) and grains (0.7 pcs.), grain weight per plant (0.06 g)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1548

e2
“The scheme of the experiments: crop density 5.0 million pcs./ha (control) and 7.0 million pcs./ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–459

Title

Features of Morphological Reactions of Collection Samples of Spring Barley to an Increase in Crop Density

L. V. Panikhina; I. N. Shchennikova Russian Agricultural Sciences 2025. doi:10.3103/s1068367425701204

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect With higher crop density, general bushiness decreased by 0.16
Intervention effect With higher crop density, productive bushiness decreased by 0.11
Intervention effect With higher crop density, the number of spikelets decreased by 0.8 pcs.
Intervention effect With higher crop density, the number of grains per ear decreased by 0.7 pcs.
Intervention effect With higher crop density, grain weight per plant decreased by 0.06 g
Intervention effect Selected barley samples significantly increased yield by 165…243 g/m2 with an increase in crop density
Intervention effect Selected barley samples significantly increased grain weight from the plant by 0.28…0.68 g with an increase in crop density
Intervention effect Selected barley samples significantly increased thousand-kernel weight by 2.4…4.0 g with an increase in crop density
Association Meteorological conditions explained 43.6–69.3% of the variation in yield, ear length, grain number per ear and productivity
Association Meteorological conditions explained 43.6–69.3% of the variation in productivity of the ear and the plant
Association Crop density explained 16.8–27.9% of the number of plants preserved for harvesting and productive stand
Observation On average 411 pcs./m2 (93%) remained in the control for harvesting
Observation On average 585 pcs./m2 (92%) remained in the experiment with the higher crop density

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With higher crop density, the number of spikelets decreased by 0.8 pcs.

Taxon: spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaree0
Treatment: an increase in crop densitye1
Outcome: number of spikeletse1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 0.8 pcs.e1
Comparator: crop density 5.0 million pcs./ha (control)e2

Verbatim

e0
“The object of study was 31 samples of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–360

e1
“with an increase in crop density, there was a significant decrease in general (by 0.16) and productive (0.11) bushiness, ear length (0.2 cm), number of spikelets (0.8 pcs.) and grains (0.7 pcs.), grain weight per plant (0.06 g)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1548

e2
“The scheme of the experiments: crop density 5.0 million pcs./ha (control) and 7.0 million pcs./ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–459

Title

Features of Morphological Reactions of Collection Samples of Spring Barley to an Increase in Crop Density

L. V. Panikhina; I. N. Shchennikova Russian Agricultural Sciences 2025. doi:10.3103/s1068367425701204

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect With higher crop density, general bushiness decreased by 0.16
Intervention effect With higher crop density, productive bushiness decreased by 0.11
Intervention effect With higher crop density, ear length decreased by 0.2 cm
Intervention effect With higher crop density, the number of grains per ear decreased by 0.7 pcs.
Intervention effect With higher crop density, grain weight per plant decreased by 0.06 g
Intervention effect Selected barley samples significantly increased yield by 165…243 g/m2 with an increase in crop density
Intervention effect Selected barley samples significantly increased grain weight from the plant by 0.28…0.68 g with an increase in crop density
Intervention effect Selected barley samples significantly increased thousand-kernel weight by 2.4…4.0 g with an increase in crop density
Association Meteorological conditions explained 43.6–69.3% of the variation in yield, ear length, grain number per ear and productivity
Association Meteorological conditions explained 43.6–69.3% of the variation in productivity of the ear and the plant
Association Crop density explained 16.8–27.9% of the number of plants preserved for harvesting and productive stand
Observation On average 411 pcs./m2 (93%) remained in the control for harvesting
Observation On average 585 pcs./m2 (92%) remained in the experiment with the higher crop density

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With higher crop density, the number of grains per ear decreased by 0.7 pcs.

Taxon: spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaree0
Treatment: an increase in crop densitye1
Outcome: grainse1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 0.7 pcs.e1
Comparator: crop density 5.0 million pcs./ha (control)e2

Verbatim

e0
“The object of study was 31 samples of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–360

e1
“with an increase in crop density, there was a significant decrease in general (by 0.16) and productive (0.11) bushiness, ear length (0.2 cm), number of spikelets (0.8 pcs.) and grains (0.7 pcs.), grain weight per plant (0.06 g)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1548

e2
“The scheme of the experiments: crop density 5.0 million pcs./ha (control) and 7.0 million pcs./ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–459

Title

Features of Morphological Reactions of Collection Samples of Spring Barley to an Increase in Crop Density

L. V. Panikhina; I. N. Shchennikova Russian Agricultural Sciences 2025. doi:10.3103/s1068367425701204

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect With higher crop density, general bushiness decreased by 0.16
Intervention effect With higher crop density, productive bushiness decreased by 0.11
Intervention effect With higher crop density, ear length decreased by 0.2 cm
Intervention effect With higher crop density, the number of spikelets decreased by 0.8 pcs.
Intervention effect With higher crop density, grain weight per plant decreased by 0.06 g
Intervention effect Selected barley samples significantly increased yield by 165…243 g/m2 with an increase in crop density
Intervention effect Selected barley samples significantly increased grain weight from the plant by 0.28…0.68 g with an increase in crop density
Intervention effect Selected barley samples significantly increased thousand-kernel weight by 2.4…4.0 g with an increase in crop density
Association Meteorological conditions explained 43.6–69.3% of the variation in yield, ear length, grain number per ear and productivity
Association Meteorological conditions explained 43.6–69.3% of the variation in productivity of the ear and the plant
Association Crop density explained 16.8–27.9% of the number of plants preserved for harvesting and productive stand
Observation On average 411 pcs./m2 (93%) remained in the control for harvesting
Observation On average 585 pcs./m2 (92%) remained in the experiment with the higher crop density

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With higher crop density, grain weight per plant decreased by 0.06 g

Taxon: spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaree0
Treatment: an increase in crop densitye1
Outcome: grain weight per plante1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 0.06 ge1
Comparator: crop density 5.0 million pcs./ha (control)e2

Verbatim

e0
“The object of study was 31 samples of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–360

e1
“with an increase in crop density, there was a significant decrease in general (by 0.16) and productive (0.11) bushiness, ear length (0.2 cm), number of spikelets (0.8 pcs.) and grains (0.7 pcs.), grain weight per plant (0.06 g)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1548

e2
“The scheme of the experiments: crop density 5.0 million pcs./ha (control) and 7.0 million pcs./ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–459

Title

Features of Morphological Reactions of Collection Samples of Spring Barley to an Increase in Crop Density

L. V. Panikhina; I. N. Shchennikova Russian Agricultural Sciences 2025. doi:10.3103/s1068367425701204

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect With higher crop density, general bushiness decreased by 0.16
Intervention effect With higher crop density, productive bushiness decreased by 0.11
Intervention effect With higher crop density, ear length decreased by 0.2 cm
Intervention effect With higher crop density, the number of spikelets decreased by 0.8 pcs.
Intervention effect With higher crop density, the number of grains per ear decreased by 0.7 pcs.
Intervention effect Selected barley samples significantly increased yield by 165…243 g/m2 with an increase in crop density
Intervention effect Selected barley samples significantly increased grain weight from the plant by 0.28…0.68 g with an increase in crop density
Intervention effect Selected barley samples significantly increased thousand-kernel weight by 2.4…4.0 g with an increase in crop density
Association Meteorological conditions explained 43.6–69.3% of the variation in yield, ear length, grain number per ear and productivity
Association Meteorological conditions explained 43.6–69.3% of the variation in productivity of the ear and the plant
Association Crop density explained 16.8–27.9% of the number of plants preserved for harvesting and productive stand
Observation On average 411 pcs./m2 (93%) remained in the control for harvesting
Observation On average 585 pcs./m2 (92%) remained in the experiment with the higher crop density

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease in density”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics