Claim · model-written summary
Compost application decreased soil hardness and bulk density, with the reported compost order CMSC, ChMSC, PMSC.
- Taxon
- Paddyt0
- Treatment
- application of composte0
- Outcome
- soil hardness, and bulk densitye0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Qualifier
- CMSC, ChMSC, and PMSCe0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“soil hardness, and bulk density tended to decrease with application of compost and decreased in order of CMSC, ChMSC, and PMSC”
t0“Paddy Field”
Title
Composting Impacts on Soil Properties and Productivity in a Fluvio-marine Deposit Paddy Field
Chang-Hyu Yang; Byeong‐Su Kim; Chul-Hyun Yoo; et al. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer 2007
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Compost application increased organic matter, available phosphorus, available silicate, and exchangeable cations in soil.
- Observation Nitrogen uptake ranked CMSC, ChMSC, SF, PMSC.
- Observation Nitrogen use efficiency ranked CMSC, ChMSC, SF, PMSC.
- Intervention effect CMSC increased rice yield across application schedules relative to SF.
- Intervention effect ChMSC increased rice yield when applied every other year relative to SF.
- Intervention effect PMSC increased rice yield when applied every other year relative to SF.
- Intervention effect Average annual rice yield increased with CMSC across application schedules relative to SF.
- Intervention effect Average annual rice yield increased with alternate-year ChMSC relative to SF.
- Intervention effect Average annual rice yield decreased with PMSC across application schedules relative to SF.
- Observation PMSC produced high head rice and perfect grain ratios.
- Observation ChMSC produced high head rice and perfect grain ratios with annual and alternate-year application.
- Intervention effect CMSC lowered the head rice and perfect grain ratios by 10~13 relative to SF.