View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Residual sums of squares differed significantly between linear and nonlinear methods .
Outcomeresidual sum of squares e0 Comparatorlinear vs. nonlinear estimation methods e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The differences in residual sum of squares between the linear vs. nonlinear estimation methods , and that between the continuous vs. discontinuous functions, were significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1264 t0 “Root Water Uptake Simulation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–88 e1 “The model calibration and validation were carried out using the data for soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] grown in large soil columns. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–537 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
FAO Penman–Monteith estimates differed significantly from other methods .
Comparatoreach of the other methods e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “significant difference between the FAO Penman–Monteith method and each of the other methods ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–816 e1 “five widely cultivated crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–631 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Range condition methods and study areas differed significantly.
TaxonKabirkooh grasslands t0 Outcomesignificant differences e0 Comparatordifferent areas e0 Verbatim
e0 “The results showed that there were significant differences (p<0.01) between both range conditions’ determination methods and different areas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–831 t0 “Kabirkooh grasslands ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–272 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
RF estimation accuracy differed significantly across model inputs, unlike the other four models.
Outcomeaccuracy of model estimation e0 Directionsignificantly different e0 Comparatorthe other four models e0 Verbatim
e0 “The accuracy of model estimation based on RF is significantly different for different model inputs, while the other four models have small differences. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1409 t0 “Cinnamomum camphora ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–116 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Thresholding methods differed significantly in accuracy for estimated fine-root projected area.
Outcometotal projected area e0 Directionsignificantly better e0 Verbatim
e0 “some of the thresholding methods perform significantly better than others in the estimation of total projected area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–846 t0 “roots of cork oak (Quercus suber L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–720 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Residual sums of squares differed significantly between continuous and discontinuous functions.
Outcomeresidual sum of squares e0 Comparatorcontinuous vs. discontinuous functions e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The differences in residual sum of squares between the linear vs. nonlinear estimation methods , and that between the continuous vs. discontinuous functions, were significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1264 t0 “Root Water Uptake Simulation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–88 e1 “The model calibration and validation were carried out using the data for soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] grown in large soil columns. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–537 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Surface and subsurface drip irrigation differed significantly
Outcomesignificant difference between surface and subsurface drip irrigation methods e0 Verbatim
e0 “Other results of this research include the significant difference between surface and subsurface drip irrigation methods ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 6841–6961 e1 “The present research has been carried out in pistachio orchards in Zarandieh city of Markazi province ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2241–2342 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize genotypes differed highly significantly for all studied characters.
Outcomeall studied characters e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The analysis of variance confirmed that the mean squares due to genotypes were highly significant for all studied characters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–773 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–109 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Biomass-related traits differed significantly among ecotypes.
Outcomebiomass-related parameters e0 Verbatim
e0 “Among ecotypes, significant differences were found in the studied biomass-related parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–790 e1 “Opuntia ficus-indica ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–46 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The seven rice genotypes differed significantly across all studied traits.
Outcomeall studied traits e0 Verbatim
e0 “The genotypes showed significant differences in the 5% probability level for all studied traits. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–789 t0 “Rice Crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.