View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The strongest negative linear correlation was at 20–30 cm depth, with coefficient −0.808.
Outcomecorrelation coefficient e0 Directionnegative correlation e0 Setting20~30 cm(ΔT) depth e0 Verbatim
e0 “the most significantly linear negative correlation in the range of 20~30 cm(ΔT) depth,and the correlation coefficient is-0.808 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–955 t0 “tomatoes as a research object ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–192 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The linear relationship of Mn+2 uptake by straw or seed had a significant correlation coefficient (R 2 = 0.5).
Organ / stagestraw or seed e6 Outcomecorrelation coefficient e6 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e6 “This linear relationship has significant correlation coefficient (R 2 = 0.5) of Mn+2 uptake by straw or seed plants after end of stages ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1805 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Linear correlation between SOC and TN contents in topsoil (0-20 cm) was significantly positive ( correlation coefficient 0.947).
Organ / stagetopsoil (0-20 cm) e4 Outcomelinear correlation between SOC and TN contents e4 Valuecorrelation coefficient = 0.947** e4 Verbatim
t0 “SYNERGISTIC EFFECT OF FERTILIZATION ON INTERANNUAL VARIATION OF SOIL CARBON AND NITROGEN CONTENTS AND SOYBEAN YIELD IN SEMIARID SOIL ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–132 e4 “There was a significant positive linear correlation between SOC and TN contents in topsoil (0-20 cm) (P < 0.01; correlation coefficient = 0.947**) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1005 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The two methods had a significant linear relation in measured transpiration, with reported correlation coefficient R20.8.
Outcomerate of water consumption by transpiration was linear e0 Comparatorthese two measured methods e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The rate of water consumption by transpiration was linear by these two measured methods,( correlation coefficient ,R20.8),and the correlation was significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1144 t0 “poplar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Recommended application rates from the new model and QPFM had a significant linear correlation .
Outcomelinear correlation coefficient e0 Not reported Taxon Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The linear correlation coefficient of the recommended application rates between the new model and the unary QPFM reached a significant level. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1145 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The model and observed LAI had a correlation coefficient of 0.98, significant at 1%.
Outcomelinear correlation coefficient e0 Verbatim
e0 “the linear correlation coefficient was 0.98,which is significant at 1% level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–872 e1 “LAI for winter wheat in 2003~2004 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–741 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Linear regression between mean live larvae per leaflet and mean pupae per tray was significant, with a correlation coefficient of 0.876
Outcomecorrelation coefficient e1 Verbatim
e0 “A sampling technique, utilizing styrofoam trays to trap prepupae of Liriomyza sativae Blanchard falling from tomato foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 e1 “A linear regression beween the mean number of medium and large live larvae per leaflet vs. the mean number of pupae per tray was significant with a correlation coefficient of 0.876 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–386 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Linear regression of leaf shape on size was significant (p<0.001) but with a low negative correlation (r=-0.18) and low determination coefficient (r2=0.033).
Verbatim
t0 “Norway maple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71 e1 “linear regression of shape and size shows a significant p.value of <0.001 but a low negative coefficient of correlation r= -0.18 and a low coefficient of determination r2= 0.033 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1160 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Schisandrin content of Schisandra chinensis decreased significantly with increasing altitude ( linear fitting coefficient 0.8441).
Qualifiersignificant linear e3 Verbatim
t0 “Schisandra chinensis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–60 e3 “It had significant linear negative correlation relationship between schisandrin, schizandrin A, B and altitude, the contents decreased with the increase of altitude ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1028 e4 “The significant negative linear fitting coefficient was 0.844 1 between schisandrin and altitude ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1126 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The nonlinear regression correlation coefficient was significant.
Outcomecorrelation coefficient e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 e0 “its proposal model of non linear regression is, 2=3647 3217+27 6250X 0.5877X 2,it shows that correlation coefficient is significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–556 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.