View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Aerial imagery underestimated quality of feed and precision indices .
quality of feed and precision indices e0 underestimated e0 Aerial imagery data source e0 Verbatim
e0 “Aerial imagery data source underestimated quality of feed and precision indices ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1225 t0 “Drone Imagery for Monitoring Performance of a Modified Drill ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–75 e1 “no-till corn planter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–52 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At L3, mean quality feed index was 89.03%.
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 e0 “The mean values of missing-, multi-, quality - feed and precision indices were 5.14%, 5.833%, 89.03% and 17.85% at L3, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–979 Other claims from this paper (19) Association Tillage level and travel speed significantly affected the sowing uniformity indices. Observation The maximum miss-seeding index was 22.12% at L1 and S4. Observation The maximum multiple index occurred at L1 and S1. Observation At L3, mean missing index was 5.14%. Observation At L3, mean multiple index was 5.833%. Observation At L3, mean precision index was 17.85%. Observation At S1, mean multi-index was 17.59%. Observation At S2, mean multi-index was 14.44%. Observation At S3, mean multi-index was 12.40%. Observation At S4, mean multi-index was 10.18%. Observation At S1, mean quality feed index was 74.07%. Observation At S2, mean quality feed index was 75.92%. Observation At S3, mean quality feed index was 75.74%. Observation At S4, mean quality feed index was 74.07%. Observation At S1, mean precision index was 21.47%. Observation At S2, mean precision index was 23.26%. Observation At S3, mean precision index was 25.51%. Observation At S4, mean precision index was 28.53%. Recommendation With proper seedbed preparation, the planter can seed maize within an acceptable precision range. Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Transplanter accuracy indices were generally similar in tilled and no-till soils.
accuracy parameters (multiple index, miss index, quality of feed index, and precision) e0 tilled and no-till soils e0 Verbatim
e0 “The accuracy parameters (multiple index, miss index, quality of feed index, and precision ) were estimated and in general were similar in the tilled and no-till soils ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–880 t0 “Vegetable ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–17 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At L3, mean precision index was 17.85%.
precision indices e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 e0 “The mean values of missing-, multi-, quality - feed and precision indices were 5.14%, 5.833%, 89.03% and 17.85% at L3, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–979 Other claims from this paper (19) Association Tillage level and travel speed significantly affected the sowing uniformity indices. Observation The maximum miss-seeding index was 22.12% at L1 and S4. Observation The maximum multiple index occurred at L1 and S1. Observation At L3, mean missing index was 5.14%. Observation At L3, mean multiple index was 5.833%. Observation At L3, mean quality feed index was 89.03%. Observation At S1, mean multi-index was 17.59%. Observation At S2, mean multi-index was 14.44%. Observation At S3, mean multi-index was 12.40%. Observation At S4, mean multi-index was 10.18%. Observation At S1, mean quality feed index was 74.07%. Observation At S2, mean quality feed index was 75.92%. Observation At S3, mean quality feed index was 75.74%. Observation At S4, mean quality feed index was 74.07%. Observation At S1, mean precision index was 21.47%. Observation At S2, mean precision index was 23.26%. Observation At S3, mean precision index was 25.51%. Observation At S4, mean precision index was 28.53%. Recommendation With proper seedbed preparation, the planter can seed maize within an acceptable precision range. Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At S1, mean quality feed index was 74.07%.
quality feed index e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 e0 “The mean values of multi-index 17.59%, 14.44%, 12.40% and 10.18%, quality feed index 74.07%, 75.92%, 75.74% and 74.07% and precision indices 21.47%, 23.26%, 25.51% and 28.53% were at S1, S2, S3 and S4, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1195 Other claims from this paper (19) Association Tillage level and travel speed significantly affected the sowing uniformity indices. Observation The maximum miss-seeding index was 22.12% at L1 and S4. Observation The maximum multiple index occurred at L1 and S1. Observation At L3, mean missing index was 5.14%. Observation At L3, mean multiple index was 5.833%. Observation At L3, mean quality feed index was 89.03%. Observation At L3, mean precision index was 17.85%. Observation At S1, mean multi-index was 17.59%. Observation At S2, mean multi-index was 14.44%. Observation At S3, mean multi-index was 12.40%. Observation At S4, mean multi-index was 10.18%. Observation At S2, mean quality feed index was 75.92%. Observation At S3, mean quality feed index was 75.74%. Observation At S4, mean quality feed index was 74.07%. Observation At S1, mean precision index was 21.47%. Observation At S2, mean precision index was 23.26%. Observation At S3, mean precision index was 25.51%. Observation At S4, mean precision index was 28.53%. Recommendation With proper seedbed preparation, the planter can seed maize within an acceptable precision range. Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At S2, mean quality feed index was 75.92%.
quality feed index e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 e0 “The mean values of multi-index 17.59%, 14.44%, 12.40% and 10.18%, quality feed index 74.07%, 75.92%, 75.74% and 74.07% and precision indices 21.47%, 23.26%, 25.51% and 28.53% were at S1, S2, S3 and S4, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1195 Other claims from this paper (19) Association Tillage level and travel speed significantly affected the sowing uniformity indices. Observation The maximum miss-seeding index was 22.12% at L1 and S4. Observation The maximum multiple index occurred at L1 and S1. Observation At L3, mean missing index was 5.14%. Observation At L3, mean multiple index was 5.833%. Observation At L3, mean quality feed index was 89.03%. Observation At L3, mean precision index was 17.85%. Observation At S1, mean multi-index was 17.59%. Observation At S2, mean multi-index was 14.44%. Observation At S3, mean multi-index was 12.40%. Observation At S4, mean multi-index was 10.18%. Observation At S1, mean quality feed index was 74.07%. Observation At S3, mean quality feed index was 75.74%. Observation At S4, mean quality feed index was 74.07%. Observation At S1, mean precision index was 21.47%. Observation At S2, mean precision index was 23.26%. Observation At S3, mean precision index was 25.51%. Observation At S4, mean precision index was 28.53%. Recommendation With proper seedbed preparation, the planter can seed maize within an acceptable precision range. Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At S3, mean quality feed index was 75.74%.
quality feed index e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 e0 “The mean values of multi-index 17.59%, 14.44%, 12.40% and 10.18%, quality feed index 74.07%, 75.92%, 75.74% and 74.07% and precision indices 21.47%, 23.26%, 25.51% and 28.53% were at S1, S2, S3 and S4, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1195 Other claims from this paper (19) Association Tillage level and travel speed significantly affected the sowing uniformity indices. Observation The maximum miss-seeding index was 22.12% at L1 and S4. Observation The maximum multiple index occurred at L1 and S1. Observation At L3, mean missing index was 5.14%. Observation At L3, mean multiple index was 5.833%. Observation At L3, mean quality feed index was 89.03%. Observation At L3, mean precision index was 17.85%. Observation At S1, mean multi-index was 17.59%. Observation At S2, mean multi-index was 14.44%. Observation At S3, mean multi-index was 12.40%. Observation At S4, mean multi-index was 10.18%. Observation At S1, mean quality feed index was 74.07%. Observation At S2, mean quality feed index was 75.92%. Observation At S4, mean quality feed index was 74.07%. Observation At S1, mean precision index was 21.47%. Observation At S2, mean precision index was 23.26%. Observation At S3, mean precision index was 25.51%. Observation At S4, mean precision index was 28.53%. Recommendation With proper seedbed preparation, the planter can seed maize within an acceptable precision range. Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At S4, mean quality feed index was 74.07%.
quality feed index e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 e0 “The mean values of multi-index 17.59%, 14.44%, 12.40% and 10.18%, quality feed index 74.07%, 75.92%, 75.74% and 74.07% and precision indices 21.47%, 23.26%, 25.51% and 28.53% were at S1, S2, S3 and S4, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1195 Other claims from this paper (19) Association Tillage level and travel speed significantly affected the sowing uniformity indices. Observation The maximum miss-seeding index was 22.12% at L1 and S4. Observation The maximum multiple index occurred at L1 and S1. Observation At L3, mean missing index was 5.14%. Observation At L3, mean multiple index was 5.833%. Observation At L3, mean quality feed index was 89.03%. Observation At L3, mean precision index was 17.85%. Observation At S1, mean multi-index was 17.59%. Observation At S2, mean multi-index was 14.44%. Observation At S3, mean multi-index was 12.40%. Observation At S4, mean multi-index was 10.18%. Observation At S1, mean quality feed index was 74.07%. Observation At S2, mean quality feed index was 75.92%. Observation At S3, mean quality feed index was 75.74%. Observation At S1, mean precision index was 21.47%. Observation At S2, mean precision index was 23.26%. Observation At S3, mean precision index was 25.51%. Observation At S4, mean precision index was 28.53%. Recommendation With proper seedbed preparation, the planter can seed maize within an acceptable precision range. Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At S1, mean precision index was 21.47%.
precision indices e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 e0 “The mean values of multi-index 17.59%, 14.44%, 12.40% and 10.18%, quality feed index 74.07%, 75.92%, 75.74% and 74.07% and precision indices 21.47%, 23.26%, 25.51% and 28.53% were at S1, S2, S3 and S4, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1195 Other claims from this paper (19) Association Tillage level and travel speed significantly affected the sowing uniformity indices. Observation The maximum miss-seeding index was 22.12% at L1 and S4. Observation The maximum multiple index occurred at L1 and S1. Observation At L3, mean missing index was 5.14%. Observation At L3, mean multiple index was 5.833%. Observation At L3, mean quality feed index was 89.03%. Observation At L3, mean precision index was 17.85%. Observation At S1, mean multi-index was 17.59%. Observation At S2, mean multi-index was 14.44%. Observation At S3, mean multi-index was 12.40%. Observation At S4, mean multi-index was 10.18%. Observation At S1, mean quality feed index was 74.07%. Observation At S2, mean quality feed index was 75.92%. Observation At S3, mean quality feed index was 75.74%. Observation At S4, mean quality feed index was 74.07%. Observation At S2, mean precision index was 23.26%. Observation At S3, mean precision index was 25.51%. Observation At S4, mean precision index was 28.53%. Recommendation With proper seedbed preparation, the planter can seed maize within an acceptable precision range. Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At S2, mean precision index was 23.26%.
precision indices e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 e0 “The mean values of multi-index 17.59%, 14.44%, 12.40% and 10.18%, quality feed index 74.07%, 75.92%, 75.74% and 74.07% and precision indices 21.47%, 23.26%, 25.51% and 28.53% were at S1, S2, S3 and S4, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1195 Other claims from this paper (19) Association Tillage level and travel speed significantly affected the sowing uniformity indices. Observation The maximum miss-seeding index was 22.12% at L1 and S4. Observation The maximum multiple index occurred at L1 and S1. Observation At L3, mean missing index was 5.14%. Observation At L3, mean multiple index was 5.833%. Observation At L3, mean quality feed index was 89.03%. Observation At L3, mean precision index was 17.85%. Observation At S1, mean multi-index was 17.59%. Observation At S2, mean multi-index was 14.44%. Observation At S3, mean multi-index was 12.40%. Observation At S4, mean multi-index was 10.18%. Observation At S1, mean quality feed index was 74.07%. Observation At S2, mean quality feed index was 75.92%. Observation At S3, mean quality feed index was 75.74%. Observation At S4, mean quality feed index was 74.07%. Observation At S1, mean precision index was 21.47%. Observation At S3, mean precision index was 25.51%. Observation At S4, mean precision index was 28.53%. Recommendation With proper seedbed preparation, the planter can seed maize within an acceptable precision range. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays subsp. mayse1
Zea mays