Method / resource 289,819 claims

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Probable error was about 18% for old Scotch oat varieties.

Material
old Scotch varietiese0
Outcome
probable errore0
Value
18 per cente0

Verbatim

e0

“For the old Scotch varieties of oat the probable error on trials of this kind amounts to about 18 per cent, of the yield of grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–393

Title

Field experiments

Reginald Arthur Berry; Daniel Grant O'Brien The Journal of Agricultural Science 1924. doi:10.1017/s0021859600003683

Other claims from this paper (4)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Probable error was about 20% for new oat varieties.

Material
new varietiese0
Outcome
probable errort0
Value
20 per cente0

Verbatim

e0

“and to about 20 per cent, for the new varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–442
t0

“For the old Scotch varieties of oat the probable error on trials of this kind amounts to about 18 per cent, of the yield of grain and to about 20 per cent, for the new varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–442

Title

Field experiments

Reginald Arthur Berry; Daniel Grant O'Brien The Journal of Agricultural Science 1924. doi:10.1017/s0021859600003683

Other claims from this paper (4)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 5% expected yield difference would require 214 single-plot centers.

Outcome
necessary to have 214 centrese0
Value
214 centrese0

Verbatim

e0

“when the difference is not likely to be more than about 5 per cent, it would be necessary to have 214 centres”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–708
t0

“Adopting single plot trials an 18 per cent, error means that when determining the superiority in the yield of grain of one variety over that of another”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–594
e1

“one variety of oat with that of another”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–180

Title

Field experiments

Reginald Arthur Berry; Daniel Grant O'Brien The Journal of Agricultural Science 1924. doi:10.1017/s0021859600003683

Other claims from this paper (4)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 10% expected yield difference would require 53 centers.

Outcome
necessary to have 53 centrese0
Value
53 centrese0

Verbatim

e0

“When the difference is likely to be about 10 per cent, it would be necessary to have 53 centres.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–929
t0

“Adopting single plot trials an 18 per cent, error means that when determining the superiority in the yield of grain of one variety over that of another”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–594
e1

“one variety of oat with that of another”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–180

Title

Field experiments

Reginald Arthur Berry; Daniel Grant O'Brien The Journal of Agricultural Science 1924. doi:10.1017/s0021859600003683

Other claims from this paper (4)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mercuric chloride was favored over cheese cloth on cost and adaptability, subject to testing in high-insect seasons.

Outcome
cost and adaptabilitye0
Direction
in favore0
Qualifier
during seasons of maximum abundance of the insecte0
Comparator
cheese cloth methodse0

Verbatim

e0

“Comparisons of the mercuric chloride and cheese cloth methods are decidedly in favor of the former, as regard~ cost and adaptability, although the method has still to prove its worth during seasons of maximum abundance of the insect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–402
e1

“Control of the cabbage maggot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29

Title

Control of the Root Maggot in Cabbage Seed-Beds

Hugh Glasgow Journal of Economic Entomology 1923. doi:10.1093/jee/16.1.68

Other claims from this paper (2)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Of other tested materials, only tobacco dust showed substantial promise against cabbage maggot.

Treatment
tobacco duste0
Outcome
promise of successe0
Direction
greate0
Comparator
other materials testede0

Verbatim

e0

“No other materials tested, except tobacco dust, gave great promise of success”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–613
e1

“Control of the cabbage maggot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29

Title

Control of the Root Maggot in Cabbage Seed-Beds

Hugh Glasgow Journal of Economic Entomology 1923. doi:10.1093/jee/16.1.68

Other claims from this paper (2)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fruit-sampling formulas gave only approximately correct values.

Taxon
oranges, lemons, and grapefruite1
Outcome
values given by the formulas are only approximately correcte0
Value
approximately correcte0

Verbatim

e0

“It is shown that the values given by the formulas are only approximately correct”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–530
e1

“oranges, lemons, and grapefruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–272

Title

Formulas for Calculating Number of Fruits Required for Adequate Sample for Analysis

F. E. Denny Botanical Gazette 1922. doi:10.1086/332958

Other claims from this paper (1)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three types of variation were distinguished.

Outcome
types of variationse0
Value
threee0

Verbatim

e0

“the three types of variations found have been genuinely distinguished”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1234
e1

““Wheat field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–123

Title

Studies in crop variation. I. An examination of the yield of dressed grain from Broadbalk

R. A. Fisher The Journal of Agricultural Science 1921. doi:10.1017/s0021859600003750

Other claims from this paper (8)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long series of average wheat yields from different fields or seasons cannot match same-field same-season plot comparisons in accuracy.

Outcome
accuracye0
Direction
cannot approache0
Comparator
comparison of plots of the same field in the same seasonse0

Verbatim

e0

“average wheat yields, even over long periods, from different fields or for different seasons cannot approach in accuracy the comparison of plots of the same field in the same seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1695

Title

Studies in crop variation. I. An examination of the yield of dressed grain from Broadbalk

R. A. Fisher The Journal of Agricultural Science 1921. doi:10.1017/s0021859600003750

Other claims from this paper (8)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slow changes in mean yield make even long series of different years from one field inaccurate to compare.

Outcome
accurately comparede0
Comparator
different years from the same fielde0

Verbatim

e0

“even comparatively long series of different years from the same field cannot be accurately compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1962–2061
e1

““Wheat field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–123

Title

Studies in crop variation. I. An examination of the yield of dressed grain from Broadbalk

R. A. Fisher The Journal of Agricultural Science 1921. doi:10.1017/s0021859600003750

Other claims from this paper (8)