Method / resource 684,532 claims

Claim · model-written summary

The weeder achieved a weeding efficiency of 81.39 per cent in the rice field.

Taxon

RiceOryza sativat0

Outcome

weeding efficiencye1

Value

81.39 per cente1

Verbatim

t0

“Intercultural Weeder for Rice”

e1

“The weeding efficiency of the machine was observed as 81.39 per cent”

Claim · model-written summary

Plant damage with the weeder was 6 per cent.

Taxon

RiceOryza sativat0

Outcome

plant damagee1

Value

6 per cente1

Verbatim

t0

“Intercultural Weeder for Rice”

e1

“The plant damage with machine was observed as 6 per cent”

Claim · model-written summary

The field capacity of the weeder was 0.30 ha h-1.

Taxon

RiceOryza sativat0

Outcome

field capacitye1

Value

0.30 ha h-1e1

Verbatim

t0

“Intercultural Weeder for Rice”

e1

“The field capacity and field efficiency of the machine were 0.30 ha h-1 and 79.12 per cent, respectively”

Claim · model-written summary

The field efficiency of the weeder was 79.12 per cent.

Taxon

RiceOryza sativat0

Outcome

field efficiencye1

Value

79.12 per cente1

Verbatim

t0

“Intercultural Weeder for Rice”

e1

“The field capacity and field efficiency of the machine were 0.30 ha h-1 and 79.12 per cent, respectively”

Claim · model-written summary

Wheel slip of the low-horsepower tractor operating the weeder in the rice field was 12.8 per cent, within the permissible limit.

Taxon

RiceOryza sativat0

Outcome

wheel slipe1

Value

12.8 per cente1

Qualifier

within the permissible limite1

Verbatim

t0

“Intercultural Weeder for Rice”

e1

“The wheel slip of the low-horsepower tractor when operating in a rice field with the machine was found to be 12.8 per cent, which is within the permissible limit”

Claim · model-written summary

The performance index of the weeder was 104.32.

Taxon

RiceOryza sativat0

Outcome

performance indexe1

Value

104.32e1

Verbatim

t0

“Intercultural Weeder for Rice”

e1

“The performance index of the machine was observed to be 104.32”

Claim · model-written summary

Weeding with the developed machine cost Rs. 1703 ha-1 compared with Rs. 3050 ha-1 for manual traditional weeding.

Taxon

RiceOryza sativat0

Outcome

cost of weedinge1

Value

Rs. 1703 ha-1e1

Qualifier

Rs. 3050 ha-1e1

Comparator

manual traditional weeding practicee1

Verbatim

t0

“Intercultural Weeder for Rice”

e1

“The cost of weeding with a developed machine was Rs. 1703 ha-1 when compared with the manual traditional weeding practice of Rs. 3050 ha-1”

Claim · model-written summary

Mathematical analysis established positivity, boundedness, and existence and stability of disease-free and endemic equilibria of the proposed model.

Taxon

tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0

Outcome

positivity, boundedness, and the existence and stabilitye1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“significantly threatens tomato cultivation”

e1

“positivity, boundedness, and the existence and stability of both disease”

Claim · model-written summary

Multiple regression models incorporating soil nitrogen and root variables explained more than 50% of the variance in summer flush phenotype.

Taxon

citrusCitrust0

Outcome

variance in SF phenotypee1

Value

>50 %e1

Verbatim

t0

“citrus”

e1

“Multiple regression models incorporating these variables explained >50 % of the variance in SF phenotype”

Claim · model-written summary

Use of the indicators suggests 58.3% of the endemic flora has non-null medicinal and aromatic potential (Indicator I1).

Taxon

endemic plantst0

Outcome

flora as of non-null MAP potential (Indicator I 1 )e0

Value

58.3%e0

Verbatim

t0

“endemic plants”

e0

“the use of indicators suggests 58.3% of the flora as of non-null MAP potential (Indicator I 1 )”