a dominant and a recessive gene 2 claims

Literal values, not normalised. 326,269 distinct spellings cover 898,882 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here.

Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Progeny tests suggest both dominant and recessive genes may condition root-knot nematode resistance.

Taxon
V. champiniiVitis ×champiniie1
Material
resistant and susceptible accessionse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pest
Gene
a dominant and a recessive genee0
Outcome
root-knot nematode resistancee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Progeny testing from crosses of resistant and susceptible accessions suggests that a dominant and a recessive gene may condition root-knot nematode resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1358
e1

“V. champinii accessions from the National Clonal Germplasm Repository”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–846
e2

“root-knot nematode ( Meloidogyne incognita )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–191

Title

034 Resistance to Root-knot Nematode in Vitis champinii

Peter Cousins; M. Andrew Walker HortScience 2000. doi:10.21273/hortsci.35.3.394a

Other claims from this paper (2)
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field resistance in three lines involved a dominant and recessive gene in each.

Taxon
isogenic linese0
Material
Thatcher+Lr3ka, Prelude+Lr3ka and Prelude+Lr3s ine0
Gene
a dominant and a recessive genee0
Outcome
field resistancee0

Verbatim

e0

“The field resistance of isogenic lines Thatcher+Lr3ka, Prelude+Lr3ka and Prelude+Lr3s in was due to a dominant and a recessive gene in each”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1032

Title

Inheritance of additional resistance from near-isogenic lines for the gene Lr3 against indian leaf rust races

R. G. Saini; Jaswinder Kaur; Anil Kumar Gupta; et al. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The) 1995

Other claims from this paper (6)