By interacting organism › Bacteria › Nannocystaceae

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-dose biochar improved abundance of Sphingomonas and Nannocystis.

Taxon: PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment: LBC amendmente0
Interactor: Sphingomonas and NannocystisNannocystisSphingomonase0symbiont
Outcome: abundance of some beneficial bacteriae0
Direction: improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Peanut-Planted Soil”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–99

e0
“the LBC amendment not only improved the abundance of some beneficial bacteria (i.e., Sphingomonas and Nannocystis )”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1029

Title

Response of Microbial Compositions and Interactions to Biochar Amendment in the Peanut-Planted Soil of the Yellow River Delta, China

Ruixue Sun; Xiangwei You; Yadong Cheng; et al. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2022. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.924358

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Biochar-amended soil had higher available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents.
Intervention effect Biochar-amended soil had higher cation exchange capacity.
Intervention effect Biochar-amended soil had lower electrical conductivity.
Intervention effect Bacterial communities were more affected than fungi by both biochar doses.
Intervention effect Low-dose biochar increased bacterial network complexity, modularity and competitive interactions.
Intervention effect High-dose biochar enriched Rozellomycota.
Intervention effect High-dose biochar decreased bacterial network modularity and competitive interactions.
Intervention effect Peanut yield decreased under high-dose biochar.
Recommendation The authors encourage considering microbial interactions when evaluating soil amendments.

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling weight and height or length except root length correlated significantly with the inhibited taxa and Nannocystaceae.

Taxon: cucumber seedlingsCucumis sativuse0
Interactor: NannocystaceaeNannocystaceaee0other
Outcome: cucumber seedlings' weight and height/lengthe0
Qualifier: except root lengthe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“cucumber seedlings' weight and height/length (except root length) were significantly correlated with the 18 inhibited taxa and the enriched taxa Nannocystaceae.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1373

Title

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FH-1 significantly affects cucumber seedlings and the rhizosphere bacterial community but not soil

Jingjing Wang; Song Xu; Rong Yang; et al. Scientific Reports 2021. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-91399-6

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect FH promoted cucumber seedling growth.
Intervention effect FH reduced rhizosphere bacterial diversity.
Intervention effect FH increased rhizosphere Proteobacteria.
Intervention effect FH decreased rhizosphere Acidobacteria.
Intervention effect FH had no effect on soil properties.
Intervention effect FH enriched GKS2_174 and Nannocystaceae.
Intervention effect FH inhibited 18 taxa.
Intervention effect FH increased bacteria-bacteria interactions.
Observation Bacillus had few interactions with taxa enriched or inhibited by FH.
Mechanism The authors speculate that indirect bacterial community changes promote seedling growth.

Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors speculate that indirect bacterial community changes promote seedling growth.

Taxon: cucumber seedlingCucumis sativuse0
Interactor: NannocystaceaeNannocystaceaee0other
Outcome: cucumber seedling growthe0
Qualifier: indirectly enriching Nannocystaceae and inhibiting some taxae0

Verbatim

e0
“FH might promote cucumber seedling growth by indirectly enriching Nannocystaceae and inhibiting some taxa from Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, BRC1, Chloroflexi, Plantctomycetes, and Verrucomicrobia.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1595

Title

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FH-1 significantly affects cucumber seedlings and the rhizosphere bacterial community but not soil

Jingjing Wang; Song Xu; Rong Yang; et al. Scientific Reports 2021. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-91399-6

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect FH promoted cucumber seedling growth.
Intervention effect FH reduced rhizosphere bacterial diversity.
Intervention effect FH increased rhizosphere Proteobacteria.
Intervention effect FH decreased rhizosphere Acidobacteria.
Intervention effect FH had no effect on soil properties.
Intervention effect FH enriched GKS2_174 and Nannocystaceae.
Intervention effect FH inhibited 18 taxa.
Intervention effect FH increased bacteria-bacteria interactions.
Observation Bacillus had few interactions with taxa enriched or inhibited by FH.
Association Seedling weight and height or length except root length correlated significantly with the inhibited taxa and Nannocystaceae.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both biostimulants stimulated Nannocystis, a potential biocompetitive agent against aflatoxigenic Aspergillus moulds, in maize rhizosphere.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: Both biostimulantse3
Interactor: NannocystisNannocystise3biocontrol_agent
Second interactor: aflatoxigenic Aspergillus mouldse3other
Outcome: gen. Nannocystise3
Direction: stimulatee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the impact of two seed-applied biostimulants on the rhizosphere bacterial community of young maize plants was evaluated”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–181

e3
“Both biostimulants were also found to stimulate gen. Nannocystis, a potential biocompetitive agent against aflatoxigenic Aspergillus moulds”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1142

Title

16S rDNA Profiling to Reveal the Influence of Seed-Applied Biostimulants on the Rhizosphere of Young Maize Plants

Giovanna Visioli; Anna Maria Sanangelantoni; Teofilo Vamerali; et al. Molecules 2018. doi:10.3390/molecules23061461

Other claims from this paper (5)

Nannocystaceae 4 claims

4 claims